LoTn. There are certain writers whose contributions they've made to WH40k's lore is just garbage.
True. However...
You need to accept that fact of life rather than agree every single time established lore gets massacred. The bigger question is why GW/BL/editors let them get away with it.
...in reality, there is no such thing as established lore in 40k. The entire setting, absolutely everything, gets interpreted differently. Compound that with the fact that dozens of authors, writers and games developers contribute to the setting in various ways (codices, novels, articles, magazines, games, comics, forums etc) and (quite often due to a lack of organisation) inevitably are not on the same page as each other. That is the nature of 40k: inconsistency. That's why Jim Swallow thinks the Sons of Horus armour is metallic coloured and everyone else thinks its pale green. That's why Mcneill fucked up the timeline of the Isstvan expedition. That's why the 28th Expeditionary Fleet was commanded by both Fulgrim and Magnus. It's why Qurze was simultaneously both Terran and Cthothian. It's why stasis fields appear differently across publications. It's why no one knew just how big the Legions were. You get my point.
The quicker one accepts the inconsistency the better it will be, it has certainly helped me recently. If you simply ignore what lore you don't like (such as Dunn's take on stasis fields) - problem solved.
What bugs me is that every time a book, codex or novel is released people whine and moan about a certain aspect of the plot not fitting in with either their own interpretations or that of another author or contributor. Yes I get it, this inconsistency can be annoying at times, especially when you think the latest way item X is portrayed is stupid or when you know such issues could have been avoided with better organisation. But you have to accept it as inevitable given how the setting is.
I haven't read the books that this thread are talking about, but spitting into a stasis field and a virus spreading throughout one seems a bit daft to me. Oh well, it doesn't bother me. :laugh: