Joined
·
313 Posts
My intent here is to get you to critically review your gaming and habits...... if you have won GTs 15 years on the trot then advice to mere mortals would also be welcome:angel:
If we break up the processes then there can be upwards of 3 major areas:
For my interpretation, one that is simplified, I would like to present this start point.
The Pre-game
(eg, force selection, composition, theme, balance, suitability, master plan etc.)
The game
(eg terrain. deployment, plan, reaction, timing, coordination, luck!!
even the Post-game
(eg, the post-mortem ... lessons learnt .. adjustment for the next pre-game phase)
I am not Wellington (Hussar!!), far from it. And I can recognise that my errors are often enforced by bad habits on my part; I find I react exactly as my opponent wants me to eg. the red mist descending to take the bait thrown out ... or forgetting the mission and trying to preserve my force or destroy the opposing when all I need to do is keep one unit alive/dead.
As is often quoted by various sages - an army in 40k is optimised when fought to the principles of its fluff. Really it is a "No shit Sherlock!" statement but I can forget this sometimes and try to play my marines as my Orks (and vise-versa).
Anyway, that is the background to my idea for this thread ... back to the question posed ....
Apart from keeping to the mission, I would think my critical point in the battle process is probably.....
the Deployment ........
I rarely seem to get this right:ireful2: Placement of the units to optomise their use (cover, LOS, fire-arcs, range etc) I often screw up.
I don't react well to my opponents placement, for countering purposes or if I place first I seem to forget the tenets of the mission or of sensible advice given previously.
I seem to forget the board layout and re-appraisal of my plan; vector in terrain/cover, approaches etc.
This is where I think I go wrong, but enhanced by not remebering the last post-game phase where I probably did identify that I lost in that deployment phase........ Again
If we break up the processes then there can be upwards of 3 major areas:
For my interpretation, one that is simplified, I would like to present this start point.
The Pre-game
(eg, force selection, composition, theme, balance, suitability, master plan etc.)
The game
(eg terrain. deployment, plan, reaction, timing, coordination, luck!!
even the Post-game
(eg, the post-mortem ... lessons learnt .. adjustment for the next pre-game phase)
I am not Wellington (Hussar!!), far from it. And I can recognise that my errors are often enforced by bad habits on my part; I find I react exactly as my opponent wants me to eg. the red mist descending to take the bait thrown out ... or forgetting the mission and trying to preserve my force or destroy the opposing when all I need to do is keep one unit alive/dead.
As is often quoted by various sages - an army in 40k is optimised when fought to the principles of its fluff. Really it is a "No shit Sherlock!" statement but I can forget this sometimes and try to play my marines as my Orks (and vise-versa).
Anyway, that is the background to my idea for this thread ... back to the question posed ....
Apart from keeping to the mission, I would think my critical point in the battle process is probably.....
the Deployment ........
I rarely seem to get this right:ireful2: Placement of the units to optomise their use (cover, LOS, fire-arcs, range etc) I often screw up.
I don't react well to my opponents placement, for countering purposes or if I place first I seem to forget the tenets of the mission or of sensible advice given previously.
I seem to forget the board layout and re-appraisal of my plan; vector in terrain/cover, approaches etc.
This is where I think I go wrong, but enhanced by not remebering the last post-game phase where I probably did identify that I lost in that deployment phase........ Again