Dammit, Vaz. I so wanted to rep you for that one!
I have told lies about the football-teams of my rivals getting it on in the locker-room. That applies to Magnus as well, he is king unreliable source as he is the arch-enemy.
And he just happens to tell the same lie as members of the Sixth Legion? That's convenient. I mean, what is Longfang thinking? Is he just an idiot that's repeating fake rumors invented by a Primarch they don't trust?
Leman Russ was raised by a wolf, and a wolf as a canine creature nothing else.
Nah. That's what a legend described in a Codex says. To the Fenrisians, who live 10,000 years after the time of Russ and whose legends are dominated by super-warriors with wolfish features, a myth of a Wolf King who landed on their planet and was raised by wolves probably makes sense. Our own mythology developed along similar lines.
As for biology. I have personally seen men covered in hair like some sort of gorilla, that's not a far stretch. Humans suddenly becoming wolves are simply a ridiculous stretch.
"Humans becoming super-powered post-human warriors with centuries-long lifespans" is a ridiculous stretch as well, wouldn't you say?
And besides, the Space Wolves aren't just "hairy people". They are individuals to whom the Canis Helix
specifically imparts canine traits.
Incidentally, I honestly feel like I'm being trolled right now! :biggrin:
As for the longfang he can be reffing to the fact that they are Space Wolves, or just pulling the leg of the younger guy.
Oh, come on. Longfang summons a punchline that's
two decades old to play a joke on Hauser? And the author doesn't so much as
hint at it? And it just so happens that this "joke" continues a theme carried across two novels? Dear God, man, you're reaching now! :biggrin:
I'm actually a bit baffled over the fact that people believes that Wulfen can change species as that's not how it is in the codex, and actually seems to be a bit of a rather I don't know sort of retarded standpoint.
Well, that's quite the ad-hominem! If you want to roll that way, though, what would you call someone's standpoint if they ignore blatantly obvious narrative delivered by the author in favor of conjecture? Or, say, when one is baffled by the idea that a human could mutate into a wolf...
but is completely kosher with the idea that he could mutate into a werewolf.
Would you have choice words for that?...
Super-human soldiers picking up traits of something is kosher. The Wulfen is the logical extreme.
Says who? How does the logic end there? No, don't worry - I get it. It's called opinion. I think kebabs are amazing, for instance, but you might think they're awful. Except it's not that kind of opinion-based contest. The author has spoken remarkably clearly; you simply don't like what he had to say.
And that's fine - you're completely entitled to your opinion that it's ludicrous for humans who become Space Marines with canine features and a propensity to turn into werewolves to later
also turn
into giant wolves. No one says you have to like it!
You can't, however, act like other people are retarded because they opted to go with what's been revealed by the new background material
rather than making up something to feel more comfortable. :wink:
They don't turn into something else as that's a too ridiculous argument for me to even consider listening to, and seethes of hatred towards the Space Wolves.
Oh, the melodrama... I assure you, I'm not opting to take into account the fairly obvious information revealed by an author because I secretly hate a fictional group of super-powered soldiers.
Authors can be mistaken like everybody else, just ask ADB.
In order to take that angle, though, you have to show how the author is incorrect.
In this case, your sole argument is "It's ridiculous that they mutate into something other than lycanthropes," followed by "A Codex didn't mention what Abnett said." Both of those points are flawed, though. One rests on your unwillingness to entertain super powers that you feel are illogical given "biological" reasons (even though your own "logical" endstate exceeds what biology allows for). The other ignores that this
entire series has been adding information not found in the Codices.
So again, I have to ask... Do you also claim that the Legions are still only made up of 10,000 Space Marines? Do you feel that Abnett hallucinated Omegon? Are battles mentioned in novels but not in Codices or old articles inapplicable figments of the authors' imaginations? Of course not.
Cheers,
P.