Warhammer 40k Forum and Wargaming Forums banner

The Modern Horus Heresy Project

1229 Views 7 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  Over Two Meters Tall!
The Heresy has been an ongoing background to 40K since its inception in some way or form, and there is a lot of information (and misinformation) going on, regarding things holding over from previous editions fluff.

The current release of stuff has discounted that previous fluff, although possibly made comments regarding it as a #TBT to the vets who remember some of the older stuff. As such, I believe the older stuff is now blowing in the wind, other than to be used an inspiration - and we know GW loves its retcons.

So, where does that leave us with Heresy stuff?

Well, we have 3 full "campaign" books from Forge World, and two "gaming" consolidatory books, backed up by 25 novels, (not including the compilations) and its numerous shorts. This provides us with an absolute ton of information of characters, not only of the legions themselves, but the auxiliary forces serving with them. Most importantly, in my mind, is the characterisation of the Primarchs, not to mention the Audio exclusives (grumble, grumble, I'm-not-7-years-old-ffs, grumble).

I have an idea of stuff I'd like to do with it, but first, is there a possibility we can get a bit of a timeline going on, with regards to the novels?

Now, that's a lot of stuff to be working through, and doesn't include anything from the 40K setting telling us "what we know" of the 30K setting. Is anyone willing to help with this first task?

1 - 2 of 8 Posts
That I was not aware of, thanks OTMT. It is indeed helpful.

The general idea was to eventually create a wiki, based on the 30K "canon" as presented. Not including the 40K stuff. For example, although we know Guilliman is killed post Heresy, the 30K canon (as presented in the above sources, and anything else released under the HH Black Library or Forge World headings) doesn't make us aware of that.

I don't trust the Lexicanum too much - it's quite poorly sourced, despite the effort that does go into it (or I've found), and I'd like to keep it differentiated as such from that setting. It would mean going through pretty much each page in those books, and writing down everything that happens in vast detail. It would also isolate the "modern" content from granfathered content from back in 2nd and 3rd editions introduced in White Dwarf articles - that stuff is now 4 editions or more ago, and actually has a dedicated team to ensure (ish) that stuff is kept to a consistent standard (if not necessarily of writing, of plot - (ish)).

The Timeline was the easiest way to see who would be interested in such an idea - by including such events. The recommended reading order I believe is the order they were published - they introduce characters you are supposed to know about - or at least recognise the processes gone on. For example, Legion needs to be read after the original trilogy, IMHO so you can understand the concept of the threat in Legion.

I'll knock up an example of what I intend over the day, and see what your opinions are, and if you're interested in such. It will take a while, but hopefully we can get a decent base on it.

See less See more
1 - 2 of 8 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.