so who do you think would win in a fight and why
Well someone hasn't been keeping up with the fluff- Blood Dragons don't kill Dragons, they train so one day each will be able to follow in their founder's footsteps and slay a Dragon to rid themselves of the thirst for blood.Blood Dragon.
The way Blood dragons become Blood dragons is by killing dragons and drinking the blood (according to the old book anyway)...so a Saurus and a Cold one don't quite measure up to a dragon...
And Lets be honest, rules wise, there isn't much that is man sized that can take on a Vampire.
well if you really want to reference the rulesBlood Dragon.
rules wise, there isn't much that is man sized that can take on a Vampire.
pretty much agree, elite sauruses are usually more than 1000 years old, run-of the-mill vamps tend to be only a few hundred years oldDepending on the age of the Saurus I'd say it could go either way, Vlad Von Carstein was pushed to defeat a Champion of Khorne so it's possible for potent man-sized opponents to equal or surpass a Vampire.
If it was a Saurus that was thousands of years old then I'd say the Lizardman every time.
sounds like an interesting fight though not exactly fair: most powerful named VC lord vs. random run-of-the-mill chaos heroThe Vampire Wars omnibus- Vlad travels to the Manor of a Sylvanian Lord who is refusing to bow down to him, and to the Vampire's surprise when he goes to strike the mortal down the, now revealed, Champion of Khorne grabs his arm and stops the blow before it can connect.