As bad as this arguement is getting..... If a Ork tech can kill an Imperium fighter, how is it that our fighters would not be better, if not a match?
The standard fighters of the imperium are the Lightning, Lightning Strike and the Thunderbolt.
Speed:
Each of the 3 fighters has a maximum speed of around 2200-2400km/h.
Eurofighter typhoon as 2,495km/h effectively around the same mark then.
A draw. Eurofighter 0.5, imperium 0.5
Armaments:
The standard weapons on a imperial fighter are..... line of sight guns and a maximum of upto a whole 6 missiles(max of 6 on the lightning strike).
*Autocannons & lascannons, 100-400 rounds for the autocannon and only 30 shots for the lascannon.
*Hellstrike missiles, thunderbolt can have upto 4 bombs if not missiles
Standard armament of a Eurofighter typhoon.
*27 mm Mauser BK-27 Revolver cannon with 150 rounds
* 13 Harspoints that can carry (including but not limited to), Various Air-to-air missiles, Various Air-to-Ground missiles, Laserguided bombs, "dumb" bombs, Bunker buster bombs, Additional electronic counter measures and even Drop away fule tanks giving extended range.
Eurofighter wins. EuroFighter 1.5, imperium 0.5
Maneuverability:
Imperial fighters are Flying bricks, more engine than plane in most cases.
The Eurofighter is one of the most maneuverable planes known about today, designed to fly fast and agile. It's better aerodynamically than any of the other 3 Imperial fighters.
Eurofighter wins. Eurofighter 2.5, Imperium 0.5
Survivability:
The imperial fighters have between 30-45mm of armour, Gunfire from small calibre weapons won't do much against it. It's a safe bet that it's ot explosive reactive armour cos on a plane, that would pretty much fuck it up in flight. It has countermeasures
such as flares and chaff. The imperium is more focused on heavy armour than secondary systems like optics or targeting aids.
Eurofighter Typhoon relies on high maneuverability, a low radar cross section (combined with the use of Radar Absorbant Materials) and countermeasures such as Flares & chaff and Electronic coutermeasure that can jam or misdirect radar guided weapons.
I'd say a draw, whilst the Imperial fighters can take more Gunfire, missiles are designed to to destroy Hard targets, a smaller missile such as a Sidewinder might not completely destroy the Imperial fighters but it would at the very least cripple it or cause it to be taken out of the sky by the blast force affecting its trajectory. The combination of electronic countermeasures, regular countermeasures, high maneuverability and a low radar cross section aid it's survivability.
Draw, Eurofighter Typhoon 3, Imperium 1
See where this is going, the Imperial fighters are a blunt force relying on heavy cannons and thick armour and pure brute speed. Where as the Eurofighter (and most of the current "earth" figthers) is a weapon of finesse, it's more versatile in roles than the Imperial fighters in atmosphere, its much more maneuverable, it has better in flight systems and countermeasures against attacks. It even has better optics for night flying and smarter targeting arrays.
Our planes are a combination of technology that we understand and constantly improve, valueing speed, maneuverability, onboard technology and weapon versatility over heavy armour and big guns.
Also, if a fighters main weapons are cannons and some hellstrike missiles, How can it be said that they are better than using nukes in a space combat?