Special request to Lord of the Night - could you please explain your criteria then you review a novel? Because i can't comprehend your almost 9 of 10 for the 'Deathfire'
Let me explain to you why - and i really wonna know - on which basis you reviewed it.
i'm truly sorry, but i'm unable to give any credibility to your review. It is written by a fanboy to get an early book, or I don't know what for, because any sane man can't like that piece of trash, that is called 'Deathfire'. Clusterfuck of the biggest proportion from Nick Kyme yet - and if I thought before, that 'Vulkan Lives' is bad, now i know what it means - the bottom of the abyss.
'Vulkan Lives' and stupid desisions is what rule that book from the start. Actions scenes are bland and wooden; book plot uninspired; all the Odyssey line is horrible as ...k. Especially with 'Yeah we got to Terra' - fuck terra we need to go to Nocturne, let's jump into the hellscape again! Glories!
Villains are such a clowns that you can't even appreciate them seriously.
One additional mentioning deserve editors and author himself for a lot of crack being used, then writing and approving the scene on Nocturne with SM burning Life-eater virus with FUCKING FLAMERS! Do you approve that Lord? Really? You think that writing is going accordingly with logic?
If i ever wasn't agreeing with you - is about that book. THAT THE MOST HORRIBLE HORUS HERESY NOVEL TO DATE. Even Battle for the Abyss is a masterpiece - comparing to that.
Plus the biggest crap of an ending - PRIMARCH IS REBORN FROM THE FIRES OF THE MOUNTAIN AFTER A LEGIONARY WENT TO THE MOUNTAIN AND SACRIFICE HIMSELF! REALLY??????? IF DADDY VULKAN IS A FUCKING PAGAN GOD NOW - WHY ALL THIS CIRCUS?