Necrons 7th edition - Page 14 - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
Wargaming News and 40k Rumors Discuss and share wargaming news, new releases, warhammer and 40k rumors here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #131 of 143 (permalink) Old 01-29-15, 12:34 PM
Rattlehead
 
MidnightSun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Sheoth
Posts: 6,741
Reputation: 83
Default

Not sure I needed a video guide for 'leadbelcher base, nuln oil wash, seraphim sepia in the recesses, green details', but the Overlord guide is nice. I like the video tutorials.

Creator of Utilitarian Ultramarines Memes - join the XIII on Facebook (no XVII allowed).
MidnightSun is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #132 of 143 (permalink) Old 01-29-15, 03:54 PM
Senior Member
 
ntaw's Avatar
ntaw's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 6,323
Reputation: 99
Default

Video tutorials are nice, though I agree with regards to Necrons and the simplicity of their general scheme. I'd love to see tutorials on trickier units like vehicles for Necrons, to see how them fancy GW painters tackle (what I find to be) their strangeness of details.

I'd also love to see some Thokt love from this new Codex! I've been going off one Warrior and one Immortal for everything I've done so far, but my limited skills in painting make it nerve wracking to attempt other things I have no basis for comparison for.

Unfortunately Canada got rid of the penny and now my two cents rounds down to zero, so...take it for what you will.

40k Army Projects

Industrial Table WIP
ntaw is offline  
post #133 of 143 (permalink) Old 01-29-15, 05:04 PM
Token Trans Mod
 
Zion's Avatar
Zion's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the internet.
Posts: 6,385
Reputation: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MidnightSun View Post
Not sure I needed a video guide for 'leadbelcher base, nuln oil wash, seraphim sepia in the recesses, green details', but the Overlord guide is nice. I like the video tutorials.
While true, it's a nice video for beginners, and I like the effect his method achieves.
Zion is offline  
 
post #134 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 03:21 PM
Senior Member
 
ntaw's Avatar
ntaw's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 6,323
Reputation: 99
Default

Just reading over the Codex now, there is no Detachment for the 'Crons like the Nemesis or Baal Strike Force but only the Decurion Detachment information which is a series of Formations that you can potentially take large groups of units in. It seems like the benefit for having a Decurion Detachment stacks with the benefits of the Formations you include as outlined at the back of the book (offering you dual RP bonuses for the Reclamation Legion, both army wide and Overlord specific), the catch is that the Decurion Detachment requires that for each Core choice you have to include 1-10 Auxiliary choices (ie. more models). You can however not choose to take a Decurion Detachment (and forgo the army-wide RP bonus) and just take the Formations as listed in the back of the book and still have a Battle Forged army as per the standard Formation rules in the BRB.

In short, the book has tons of Formations and if you take them as a Decurion Detachment instead of groups of Formations you get an extra bonus to your RP rolls army wide and your Living Metal ignores Crew Shaken/Stunned. It's cool to see such a vast expanse of special rules, but it totally pigeonholes people into buying more stuff to fill out potentially empty pockets of formation unit requirements unless they want to play without any army flavour and just stick to Combined Arms/Allied Detachments as per the BRB.

For example, if I don't buy Tomb Blades (which I never thought of or wanted in my army, really) I don't get to capitalize on fuck all for RP manipulation from Detachment rules. Furthermore, if I wanted to add only one unit selection of any type I would continue to keep those special rules at arms reach.

....I'm really not sure how I feel about it to be honest with you. Here's a TON of character to add in to your army but only if you can buy all the models GW thinks you should have to capitalize on them.

And they're not going to give you access to any consolation prize rules by giving you an actual alternative to the Combined Arms Detachment, just Formations. Seems pretty damn limiting for Necron players.

Unfortunately Canada got rid of the penny and now my two cents rounds down to zero, so...take it for what you will.

40k Army Projects

Industrial Table WIP

Last edited by ntaw; 02-01-15 at 03:23 PM.
ntaw is offline  
post #135 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 04:16 PM
Token Trans Mod
 
Zion's Avatar
Zion's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the internet.
Posts: 6,385
Reputation: 103
Default

Don't forget there is the Mephrit detachment in Exterminatus @ntaw .
Zion is offline  
post #136 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 04:29 PM
Rattlehead
 
MidnightSun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Sheoth
Posts: 6,741
Reputation: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntaw View Post
And they're not going to give you access to any consolation prize rules by giving you an actual alternative to the Combined Arms Detachment, just Formations. Seems pretty damn limiting for Necron players.
On the other hand, Ever-Living is an insane Command Benefit, and a Reclamation Legion + Canoptek Harvests and Annihilation Nexus formations is basically all the stuff you'd want anyway (the Nexus is not ideal, perhaps, but the Harvest is amazing).

And, as said, you can just bring a Mephrit Dynasty/Combined Arms and then add the formations you want (although the only one you'd willingly bring outside of a Decurion is probably the Harvest).

Creator of Utilitarian Ultramarines Memes - join the XIII on Facebook (no XVII allowed).
MidnightSun is offline  
post #137 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 05:06 PM
Vaz
Senior Member
 
Vaz's Avatar
Vaz's Flag is: United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 12,830
Reputation: 79
Default

What on earth... This is the best damn way to build an army.

Now you bonuses on top of bonuses for taking particular unit combinations.

This is essentially giving you bonuses for playing Unbound, with a small 500pt unit tax.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bindi Baji View Post
It's not a black and white question really, there are different shades of anal probing,
a rectum spectrum, if you will
Vaz is offline  
post #138 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 05:17 PM
Senior Member
 
ntaw's Avatar
ntaw's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 6,323
Reputation: 99
Default

To be fair I didn't know about the Mephrit Dynasty Detachment at all. I don't buy the campaign books because I'm rarely that interested in them (or carrying around a library to play the game), though I'm coming to see that they do sometimes add very relevant rules to the game. The Formations are sweet but I've always been turned off by them (for any army) because it feels like I'm playing GW's army and not my own. I guess I'll have to check this book out and see what's up with this Mephrit Detachment.

@Zion thanks for pointing that out, as I mentioned I had no idea it existed. Unfortunately though, the book costs more than a box of Tomb Blades and it still feels like a cash grab when they already have my cash. Way she goes, I know, and it doesn't make a difference how I feel about it...but I think it sucks. I'll still collect Necrons and be happy playing them, maybe I'll even come to like the Tomb Blades that I'll inevitably buy (since I won't be spending $80 on a book for a page of rules on a Detachment to use in games). Ultimately it's just one more thing GW's done/doing that is making me buy into other game systems and slow down this one. I had much larger aspirations for my BA and Cron armies before they got updated books, now I just want to round out what units I have and paint.

Unfortunately Canada got rid of the penny and now my two cents rounds down to zero, so...take it for what you will.

40k Army Projects

Industrial Table WIP
ntaw is offline  
post #139 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 06:20 PM
Token Trans Mod
 
Zion's Avatar
Zion's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the internet.
Posts: 6,385
Reputation: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaz View Post
What on earth... This is the best damn way to build an army.

Now you bonuses on top of bonuses for taking particular unit combinations.

This is essentially giving you bonuses for playing Unbound, with a small 500pt unit tax.
I wouldn't call this "unbound" since the rules for it make a distinction between the Decurion and Unbound.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntaw View Post
To be fair I didn't know about the Mephrit Dynasty Detachment at all. I don't buy the campaign books because I'm rarely that interested in them (or carrying around a library to play the game), though I'm coming to see that they do sometimes add very relevant rules to the game. The Formations are sweet but I've always been turned off by them (for any army) because it feels like I'm playing GW's army and not my own. I guess I'll have to check this book out and see what's up with this Mephrit Detachment.

@Zion thanks for pointing that out, as I mentioned I had no idea it existed. Unfortunately though, the book costs more than a box of Tomb Blades and it still feels like a cash grab when they already have my cash. Way she goes, I know, and it doesn't make a difference how I feel about it...but I think it sucks. I'll still collect Necrons and be happy playing them, maybe I'll even come to like the Tomb Blades that I'll inevitably buy (since I won't be spending $80 on a book for a page of rules on a Detachment to use in games). Ultimately it's just one more thing GW's done/doing that is making me buy into other game systems and slow down this one. I had much larger aspirations for my BA and Cron armies before they got updated books, now I just want to round out what units I have and paint.
Mephrit adds 3 additional relics, a different Warlord table and a non-standard FOC (1 HQ, 3 Troops to start and can take up to 1 more HQ, 5 more Troops, 3 Elite, 3 FA, 3HS, 1 LoW, 1 Fortification. It lets you re-roll 1s on Reanimation Proticols and re-roll on the Mephrit Warlord chart) that doesn't let you use the Tesseract Vault. It also has a couple of formations as well (the C'Tan one is a C'Tan and 2 Crypteks, and one of the Relics gives the C'Tan +1S/T while the Cryptek carrying it is alive).

Last edited by Zion; 02-01-15 at 06:29 PM.
Zion is offline  
post #140 of 143 (permalink) Old 02-01-15, 07:50 PM
Senior Member
 
falcoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,384
Reputation: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntaw View Post
maybe I'll even come to like the Tomb Blades that I'll inevitably buy (since I won't be spending $80 on a book for a page of rules on a Detachment to use in games)
Although tomb blades are considerably better in the new book, and I would happily take them over immortals any day (3pts more for twin link tr 5 Ap 4 rapid fire guns that ignore cover? Yeah that works pretty nicely).

Though I appreciate you point. For instance I have alsways like destroyer lords, yet to take one i have to have 9 other destroyers in my list, which is totally excessive. Or a roayl court which requires a second overlord to get access to and you have to take a lord AND cryptek, when in fact a cryptek is practically irrelevant in a decurion (though totally worth it in any other detachment)

Me: To be honest im amazed there isn't a chaos god of not revising or at least chaos god of procrastination

MidnightSun: There will be, when enough people do it. Y'know when the Eldar were all engaging in their hedonism and Slaanesh ripped open the Eye of Terror with his creation? Slaanesh will have NOTHING on the God of Procrastination, and his vile minions will carve the galaxy asunder in a thousand year reign of blood.... Tomorrow
falcoso is offline  
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > Wargaming News, New Releases and Information > Wargaming News and 40k Rumors

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome