Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums

Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums (https://www.heresy-online.net/forums/)
-   Off Topic (https://www.heresy-online.net/forums/29-off-topic/)
-   -   Roll out the Railguns!!!! (https://www.heresy-online.net/forums/off-topic/149417-roll-out-railguns.html)

gen.ahab 04-17-14 07:03 PM

13 Attachment(s)
Why? I mean that as an honest question.

emporershand89 04-18-14 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragonkingofthestars (Post 1680905)
only battle ships could house power plants large enough to make these things viable,

...this and this.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragonkingofthestars (Post 1680737)
in the battle between aircraft and battle ships, the air craft came out on top.

....and this.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragonkingofthestars (Post 1680737)
we don't have a way to use this in any practical way.

....are all valid points; but are mute in this modern day and age. In reference to the problem with power it WAS an issue 20-30 years ago. These days the restrictions on Nuclear Power are starting to wane, and the military is turning more and more to it's use in Ships, Aircraft, and general power generations for Joint-Strike bases.

To answer your one question most ships could manage to house a nuclear generator if the Navy chose to use it. My cousin recently got a job as a Nuke Engineer, and in a similar conversation mentioned to me that the Navy can design Nuclear Units to the size and proportion of the ship. They no longer need to be massive monster that power Three Mile Island or the U.S.S Nimitz/George Bush. However he also point out the reason the Navy is hesitant to put them on all ships is both Legality, Universal Safety, and Waste disposal. They don't want to have to run the Red Tape loop of Congress, they don't wanna risk a chain reaction if one detonates for some reason and the rest follow, and they really would have a hard time finind the space to dispose of the nuclear rodes safely to meet enviromental standards. I hope this answers the question, I do beleive our resident Engineer, Darkreever, might be able to answer this question a bit better than I can.

In regards to the effectiveness of the weapon yes, it's just a solid project. however if you watch this short Youtube clip of the 2013 meteor strike in Russia.....


....you'll notice the damage done by just this one small piece of solid rock. In short it only has to hit the opposing ship and sink it, or strike munitions at that speed and cause internal explosions. They could use it as a form of long-range artillery for Sea to Ground Combat (as sos demonstrated in Transformers III: Dark Side of the Moon when the Railgun shoot the Prime on the Pyramid). They could even strike the Reactor of a Nuclear ship and cause a Reactor Failure that detonates the core.....BOOMM!!!! Additionally I'm sure they are developing a safe warhead to eventually use on the projectile itself that will devlier specialize munitions to the target but for now this is what we have to work with.

Finally I want to address your question on aircraft vs Naval Ships. It is true that common thinking is that one Jet Fighter, 1-2 Missiles and the ship is history; sunk right? Wrong, very very wrong. Just on a destroyer alone you have m,utiple Surface to Air/Surface to Missile units onbaord to intercept such threats. You have numerous EMP weapons to disrupt sucvh targets and, as a final precaution, their are High-Velocity Vulcan cannons(based on the origional Gattling design) to physically shoot Missile projectiles out of the sky. If you Watch Gundam Seed/ Gubndam Seed Distiny and see all the missile combat that occurs you can get a rough picture. On Battleships and Aircraft carriers it's all the more because of the massive size of this ships, and the sheer firepower you can fit into them. Jetfighters that roaming 50-100 miles out in a protective umbrella, multipkle Defense Systems on the 3(I think it's 3) BS still employed by the U.S Navy/Coast Guard. plus with the new Aegis systems and these supposed "Lasor" weapons it adds all the more to shooting down aircraft.

In short there really is no difference between the Dive Bombers/Torpedo planes of yesterday attack Aircraft carriers and the Jet fighters attack Destroyers. smaller, faster, Deadliest, and Sleeker is the trend right now; and I personally don't see that changing anytime in the near future.

Jolnir 04-18-14 03:01 AM

A ship with a big hole in it doesn't float very well. Just sayin'.

incinerator950 04-18-14 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nacho libre (Post 1681265)
Seems like a huge waste of money to me.

You should see our new line up of aluminum speed boats, I mean picket ships.

Nacho libre 04-18-14 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by incinerator950 (Post 1683362)
You should see our new line up of aluminum speed boats, I mean picket ships.

Aluminium, rounds would go through that like a hot knife through butter.

incinerator950 04-18-14 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nacho libre (Post 1683370)
Aluminium, rounds would go through that like a hot knife through butter.

Their purpose is to be fast enough not to be hit. Not counting the early versions of their alloy armor was also prone to incendiary damage.

Nacho libre 04-18-14 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by incinerator950 (Post 1683466)
Their purpose is to be fast enough not to be hit. Not counting the early versions of their alloy armor was also prone to incendiary damage.

Good point aluminium has a decent melting point. 600 degrees Celsius i think.:scratchhead:

incinerator950 04-18-14 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nacho libre (Post 1683530)
Good point aluminium has a decent melting point. 600 degrees Celsius i think.:scratchhead:

Well, Aluminum melts faster and easier than Iron or Steel does. Aboard ships, this is especially devastating because fires are the most dangerous thing aboard a vessel besides a hull breach flooding.

While aluminum lasts longer, and potentially be used for small arms fire resistance, they're on the ocean. The weapons you need to worry about are all medium and large caliber machine guns, cannons, and a range of short to long distance ballistic missiles, rockets, and torpedoes. All of which easily puncture Aluminum, set it on fire, and cause it to be destroyed faster.

They're only using it to cheaply produce a lighter series of craft based on speed, stealth, and hoping you see them first and shoot before.

emporershand89 04-18-14 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by incinerator950 (Post 1683362)
aluminum speed boats

Jeez, I'm glad I was, and still am, a Ground Pounder. I'll stick with my 155's and Abrams thank you; damn glass boats.

Wusword77 04-23-14 12:43 AM

Because the real advantage to a Rail gun isn't that you could easily fire a nuke at hypersonic speeds from within a few miles of a coast line at a target.

Have none of you played Metal Gear?


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Powered by the Emperor of Man.


vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.0 Beta 4 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome