As opposed to that 9 year old killing someone?
It is a man pulling the trigger. Yes, yes, we get that. Glad you've got inbred mind around that.
Because that gun the 9 year old was using was in her safe. Because that Delta operator I met a few years ago shot his kid with an ND shortly after returning. Accidents happen. A bit like kids burn themselves on hot stoves. What do you do? You prevent that - stop the kid going into the kitchen, or remove access to that weapon.
Both of those were with legal firearms. That's 1 instructor who would be alive, and one kid who has a father and isn't bound into a wheelchair for the rest of his life.
The Majority of mass shootings were using legally owned weapons. There's an actual correlation between those who own guns and being more likely to commit other offences. The inability of the country to enforce their laws is more problematic, but should be done about.
The majority of people purchase weapons for recreation. Might as well say I'm going to purchase Heroin for recreation.
Criminals not subject to background checks - a bit like people ignore speed limits right?
Protecting yourself? You're virtually incapable of defending yourself with a gun if one is drawn on you before you have a chance. You're not going to draw, unsafe, raise, sight and fire before you've got a round entering your face.
Some handly links;
I'm not saying that removing gun ownership is a panacea and magic silver bullet which will cure America and turn it into some world superpower once again, but I'm saying that despite you, and quite a few others, removing the vehicle/delivery of that danger at the expense of you not having a toy (and that meaning that you have a receipt to prove ownership, or a government recognised valuation of its worth, and that you should be recompensed for its loss during an amnesty) is worth that.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3