fantasy vs 40k - Page 2 - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
Off Topic Totally off-topic chat in here.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 16 (permalink) Old 01-15-14, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
Vaz's Avatar
Vaz's Flag is: United Kingdom
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 12,830
Reputation: 79

Eh, 8th edition ruined Fantasy for me (the core game; most of the army books are actually quite good; Vampires, for example). 6th edition in my eyes was the sweet spot. There were a few annoying rules here and there, but mostly, they made a solid improvement on 5th edition.

In 7th, it became a game of building lists to win. If you had the right list, it was near enough impossible to lose. If you brought the wrong army, it was near enough impossible to win. In 8th, however, it all became far more random. Rather than ability at the game being how you fixed it (like in 6th), everything was just on the roll of dice. Entire units would vanish because someone rolled two dice in a particular manner.

Other armies became utterly broken due to their ability to remove the randomness from the dice rolls.

It gets to the stage where my Elven Cavalry would fail to charge against a unit of Dwarven infantry, thanks to Snake eyes, only to see the Dwarfs charge 10".

I don't want to look back with rose tinted glasses, as there were always problems with it. However, the increase of gaming forums has increased the gamers to the availability of "power" using a collective intellect to locate good combinations. The increase in cost of units (that same Warp Spider Exarch would likely cost around £12 now, compared the £4 back in the day that you used to get); so people who spend their money obviously want the bang for the buck.

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Originally Posted by Bindi Baji View Post
It's not a black and white question really, there are different shades of anal probing,
a rectum spectrum, if you will
Vaz is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 16 (permalink) Old 01-15-14, 10:36 PM
MidnightSun's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Sheoth
Posts: 6,741
Reputation: 83

I love the aesthetic of Fantasy, but the gameplay is boring as shit. You can watch one game of Fantasy and you've essentially seen every game of Fantasy played this edition. You bring an infantry Horde, put a level 4 and a Battle Standard in it, then grind into your opponent's infantry horde with level 4 and BSB. I tried to escape from the absolute stagnation by playing a more unusual army, Ogre Kingdoms, but they're exactly the same as everyone else. Giant blocks of cheap infantry, Level 4 spellcaster, BSB, war machines. All those awesome-looking Fantasy models, the monsters and stuff? Yeah, you're never going to use it, because it will get hit by a cannon and die horribly, and can't fight half as well as a block of infantry. Cavalry, skirmishers, monsters - they all make Fantasy look varied to an outsider, but they're just a ruse of models to hide the very simple game of 'let's sit here with 50 guys on each side and roll dice for four hours'.

Lore of Death is hands down the best lore (not counting Shadow, which broke the meter when I tried to gauge how stupidly strong it is). Not because it's all that great, but because you can snipe the Battle Standard. Break the Battle Standard, and the game becomes about a thousand million times more fun and interesting because there's a whole new section of rules that deal with people leaving the twenty-four-hour-slugfest of combat. Oh, and it has one of the scary wipe spells, which saves you wearing away the bones in your wrist because you're still rolling for the combat that started when 8th edition came out.

Creator of Utilitarian Ultramarines Memes - join the XIII on Facebook (no XVII allowed).
MidnightSun is offline  
post #13 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-07-14, 03:20 AM Thread Starter
CommissarAidan's Avatar
CommissarAidan's Flag is: Australia
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 78
Reputation: 2

though there is no science to fantasy it is like oh how does a frog go on a flying chair? it is magic
CommissarAidan is offline  
post #14 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-23-14, 09:48 AM
Senior Member
Tha Tall One's Avatar
Tha Tall One's Flag is: Netherlands
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 453
Reputation: 56

I prefer fantasy. Mind you, 8th edition ruined everything, but that's why I still play 6th. It is not like you are forced to play 8th because a new rulesset came out. I'm also homebrewing a hybridized 6th/7th ruleset to smooth out some of the kinks in 6th that were fixed in 7th.
While in 8th all of the tactics are gone, I believe fantasy was somewhat more tactical than 40k in 6th/7th. Everything came down to movement. Setting up the right charges, carefully moving into flanking positions, marchblocking with scouts/flyers... I think (at least back then) it had more to it then 40k. There's something about manouvring a block of infantry that there isn't with a squad of space marines.
What I also really like about fantasy is kitting out your heroes with magic items to fit specific roles and having some surprises in store other then "I give him this gun".
I am however, building a small army of Space Orks and have enjoyed a nifty game of Kill Team. I don't think 40k is bad at all, especially comparing the current editions. Then 40k wins hands down.

Models wise, at the moment I'm kinda bored of space marines. 6 of the 40k armies are space marines, not counting Sisters of battle who are kinda space mariney as well. While they're all different, they're also kinda the same. I've also never really had an interest in giant robots and tanks, so that's probably why I started with fantasy in the first place. I must admit though, some of the 40k models are quite stunning. The new fantasy models; while some are quite beautiful, many are truly stupid. The really expensive kits came with 8th edition. I prefer 7th ed models and 6th ed prices.

(And probably older edition prices even more)
Tha Tall One is offline  
post #15 of 16 (permalink) Old 07-23-14, 09:53 AM
Haskanael's Avatar
Haskanael's Flag is: Netherlands
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,438
Reputation: 20

Originally Posted by Tha Tall One View Post
I prefer 6th ed prices.

(And probably older edition prices even more)
that is probably the greatest thing people from both systems have in common these days and I quite agree,

personaly I prefer 40.000 I'm just more of a science fiction person then a fantasy person. tho I always thought about making a dwarf army for Fantasy, I have been shelving that idea for a while because of a lack of a local fantasy community
Haskanael is offline  
post #16 of 16 (permalink) Old 08-13-14, 09:51 PM
Senior Member
bobg's Avatar
bobg's Flag is: England
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nuneaton
Posts: 228
Reputation: 1

Fantasy is the game I'm better at, it's a little more tactical and hols my attention better.

but 40k is the one everyone else played.

Someday someone will say something about me witty or memorable enough to put here til then enjoy this;

Rule 66: the cake is a lie
bobg is offline  

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > HO Off Topic > Off Topic

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome