Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - Reply to Topic
40k Fluff Discuss GW background material here. All those bits in the Codex that aren't stat blocks or special rules. Post your custom character/chapter/army background in our Homebrew Fluff subforum!

Thread: Forge World contradiction? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-28-15 05:23 AM
Haskanael if I get it right here. the quotes say that the Imperial fists have THE greatest naval might of the legiones astartes. and the sons of horus and the Ultramarines have ONE of the strongest fleets.

doesn't that just mean that in comparison to most other legions the Ultramarines and Sons of Horus have strong fleets? that would not exclude other fleets being greater. in this case the Imperial Fists.
12-28-15 03:08 AM
Rotundus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel of Blood View Post
Considering all the other rather large contradictions FW and GW make, this one is fairly minor and nitpicky. I sound have read that more about the general size of the Ultramarines and their Enpire rather than a huge fleet.
What FW internal contradiction for example? In fact, I have seen very, very few, including posted one.
12-27-15 09:08 PM
hailene I see no contradiction.

It says the Ultramarine fleet alone could not compare to the Imperial Fist's fleet. But we know from various sources that the power of a Space Marine really lies in its Astartes and boarding action.

So while the Luna Wolves and Ultramarine fleets may be more powerful in the sense of a wholistic fleet action (IE both ship-firepower and boarding actions), in a strictly ship to ship comparison, the Imperial Fists come out ahead.

Plus the second quote only mentions the Ultramarine's ranking in terms of tonnage and firepower. If, say, strategic and tactical flexibility was how the fleets were ranked, then I bet the Ultramarines would be considerably higher on the list.

Can't judge a fish on its ability to fly, after all. At least not all fish.
12-27-15 08:34 PM
DelvarusThePitFighter The Ultramarines supposedly had the largest Legion but being as the Imperial Fists were largely responsible for Terra's defences, this would require the mightiest ships the Space marines could muster and later on the Imperial Fists became entirely space bound so some their larger flag ships are their equivalent to a chapter's home planet. Something else to note would be the Iron Warrior's fleet - which was supposed to be the Imperial Fist's greatest rival - Perturabo's flagship being one of the largest of all the legions. I was also under the impression that the Dark Angels fleet was vast too
12-27-15 05:56 PM
Angel of Blood Considering all the other rather large contradictions FW and GW make, this one is fairly minor and nitpicky. I sound have read that more about the general size of the Ultramarines and their Enpire rather than a huge fleet.
12-27-15 03:25 PM
Rotundus
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathJester921 View Post
"The Imperial Fists' naval might was the greatest of any of the Legiones Astartes..... Ultramarines could not rival such strength alone."

From that quote you pulled from Extermination. I don't see anywhere that it says the Ultramarines have one of the largest fleets. Merely that they could not rival its strength. Considering the Ultramarines grasp of all things tactics, I can see them being placed among the best of the legions in terms of naval warfare with just a mid-sized fleet.

Unless you misquoted it, there is no contradiction here.
Because the Betrayal has explicitly stated Sons of Horus have one of the strongest fleet among the Legions and the quote is rather obviously implying Ultramarines navel strength is on a par with them. Moreover nuance of citation is clearly expressing Ultramarines have one of the largest fleets.
12-27-15 08:04 AM
DeathJester921 "The Imperial Fists' naval might was the greatest of any of the Legiones Astartes..... Ultramarines could not rival such strength alone."

From that quote you pulled from Extermination. I don't see anywhere that it says the Ultramarines have one of the largest fleets. Merely that they could not rival its strength. Considering the Ultramarines grasp of all things tactics, I can see them being placed among the best of the legions in terms of naval warfare with just a mid-sized fleet.

Unless you misquoted it, there is no contradiction here.
12-27-15 07:38 AM
Brother Lucian Bad editorial oversight for sure.
12-27-15 07:21 AM
Rotundus
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathJester921 View Post
I dont see any contradiction here, honestly. In both passages the Ultramarines fleet strength is still stated as being behind the Imperial Fists fleet strength.

What is the contradiction you're seeing?
Exterminationsays Ultramarines have one of the largest fleet.

Whereas Tempest says Ultramarines have middle size fleet.
12-27-15 04:54 AM
DeathJester921 I dont see any contradiction here, honestly. In both passages the Ultramarines fleet strength is still stated as being behind the Imperial Fists fleet strength.

What is the contradiction you're seeing?
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome