Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - Reply to Topic
40k Fluff Discuss GW background material here. All those bits in the Codex that aren't stat blocks or special rules. Post your custom character/chapter/army background in our Homebrew Fluff subforum!

Thread: Bolter rate of fire Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-16-14 09:31 PM
Kayback
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaz View Post
Tgere are no explosive sniper rifles being used for long range kills. Authorisation under I believe it's the geneva convention is kinda limited to encouraging the use of explosive ammunition against those targets.
Huh? You say they aren't being used then say they are being encouraged. I don't understand.


Quote:
The Raufoss is a .50cal sniper round. The .50 Cal is an anti materiel weapon. A Sniper starting his day job doesn't get equipped with a Barrett, he gets equipped with a 7.62 or slightly larger variant, not a weapon designed to take on light vehicles or helicopters. Taking advantage of a target in the open is the snipers game - as I've yet to meet a serious military marksman in 8 years of service who thought that he'd be able to do his job better the further away he was. If you're referring to Sgt. Kremer's shot, he was hunting Fedayeen and militia upgunned pick ups, as that was his task. He gave a talk when I spent 7 months with the USMC during Anglo-US joint training operations at Gila Bend with our Apache's. We learned from him about spotting targets - the main thing he was employed as, rather than as a killer - the apache with its 2 million payload was the true killer instead - it was utter chance he was in a position to take the shot - and he even said he 'missed' - the shot taking him in the stomach rather than the chest.
I don't understand this point. I never said it makes the job easier being further away, I said it can carry the energy better. The explosive payload will "hit" just as hard no matter the range. Yeah being closer is better, there are fewer variables you need to consider, but being further away generally means the enemy thinks you are out of range and takes fewer precautions or doesn't even know you are there. The 14.5x114mm that was used recently to kill an M23 leader was a long range kill on a target of opportunity, yes. Besides the US's .50's there are a couple of 20mm rifles being developed and deployed by other countries.

Quote:
The XM25 and Neopup are, according to the wiki page you linked, in direct competition with each other. The slight differences according to that page are minor points outside of the ideal of that bolter, and theoretical design.
Maybe, but the design motivation behind the XM-25 was air burst grenades to hit enemies in cover. The Neopup is a direct hit weapon, probably with a smaller frag area than the XM-25's ammo. The Bolter is a direct hit weapon as well. It is not a grenade launcher
11-16-14 10:11 AM
hailene
Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeValantine View Post
So realistically I doubt they would ever resort to fully auto fire in the first place.
Depends on what they're shooting at. A terminator would be a target worthy of full-auto (which a squad of Marines Errant manage kill a terminator in Blood Reaver). Or a Squiggoth or some large tyranid creature.

Firing at extremely fast moving targets (like the Void Stalker in, er, Void Stalker).

Would a Space Marine be typically firing on full-auto? Very unlikely. But remember Space Marines, like their war gear, were designed to take on anything the galaxy could spit at it. They were also designed for massed warfare--as we see in the pacification of Terra, the Sol system, and ultimately the Great Crusade.
11-16-14 09:43 AM
LukeValantine Bolter's are fictional weapon's in a fictional universe. Hence, they fire as fast or as slow as the author wants. All we can do as fans if make vague comparisons to modern weapons to get a standardized and mechanically feasible rate of fire. However, even in today's fire arm's most weapons firing rates are completely determined by the firing mechanisms design, so bolter's firing rates could vary drastically simply based on what pattern of bolter it is.

I will say this though, fully automatic bolters would be idiotic for a specialist force like the SM who rarly operate within reach of ammunition resupplies. Not to mention they are supposed to have target assists built into their armor, and religious amounts of fire arms training. So realistically I doubt they would ever resort to fully auto fire in the first place.
11-16-14 02:34 AM
Vaz Tgere are no explosive sniper rifles being used for long range kills. Authorisation under I believe it's the geneva convention is kinda limited to encouraging the use of explosive ammunition against those targets.

The XM25 and Neopup are, according to the wiki page you linked, in direct competition with each other. The slight differences according to that page are minor points outside of the ideal of that bolter, and theoretical design.

The Raufoss is a .50cal sniper round. The .50 Cal is an anti materiel weapon. A Sniper starting his day job doesn't get equipped with a Barrett, he gets equipped with a 7.62 or slightly larger variant, not a weapon designed to take on light vehicles or helicopters. Taking advantage of a target in the open is the snipers game - as I've yet to meet a serious military marksman in 8 years of service who thought that he'd be able to do his job better the further away he was. If you're referring to Sgt. Kremer's shot, he was hunting Fedayeen and militia upgunned pick ups, as that was his task. He gave a talk when I spent 7 months with the USMC during Anglo-US joint training operations at Gila Bend with our Apache's. We learned from him about spotting targets - the main thing he was employed as, rather than as a killer - the apache with its 2 million payload was the true killer instead - it was utter chance he was in a position to take the shot - and he even said he 'missed' - the shot taking him in the stomach rather than the chest.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
11-15-14 07:40 PM
Kayback VAZ, I mostly agree with you. The bolter is a point weapon. The Heavy Bolter may not be, but the individual SM weapon is. The armour piercing explosive bolts don't have that much of an area effect as a liquidizing effect when they explode inside a target. That's the idea behind the Marines, they go kill things that don't die easily. If it was easy to kill they'd send in the IG.

However I disagree with the XM-25 comparison, I'd say more the South African PAW-20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofYkJpxRX2c http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neopup_PAW-20

I agree that with a sniper round there isn't much need for an explosive payload against humans, however there are explosive rifles around and being used for long range kills. An explosive payload will hit just as hard at 2000m as it does at 200m. Of the 14 listed longest sniper kills on Wiki, 3 of them use .50cal Raufoss rounds which are explosive and one used a 14.5x114mm wich can fire explosive rounds as well.

The bolt is vastly over kill to kill a human, it is designed to kill without any chance of survival. Instead of punching a small permanent wound channel with a slightly larger stretch channel it is designed to explode inside a target and lacerate the vital organs, even if they have not been hit directly by the bullet. Think Traitor Marines with their redundant organs, think Ork with their extreme resistance to injury and think Tyrranid with whatever hellspawn internals they have.

It may not be a long ranged precision weapon like an M24, but it is as much of a point weapon as an M14 is. You can't miss fast enough to win a gunfight.
08-24-14 03:11 AM
Reaper45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaz View Post
Being able to be used as such does not a weapon make.

A knife is not a ranged weapon. Sure, it can be thrown. I must have thrown my bayonet thousands of times at a board and got it to stick point first in the throat of a mansized target shape in a board in my room. Doesn't make it a ranged weapon, though.

The Deuce is not a precision weapon by intent, design or use. The bolter, meanwhile, is something that is intended to kill even on a miss - similar to the 50. cal - it is fired at a RoF fast enough, with a wide enough AoE in a cone of effect to wound and suppress enemy light infantry and vehicles that are not coated in sheet metal.
Personally I always viewed the bolter as someone going.

Hmm, we're fighting green monsters that can take serious wounds before going down. Wouldn't it be nice to have a weapon that can overwhelm their toughness and put them down for good.

After all. In 40K the only weapon from our time that is used for serious warfare is amusingly enough the Deuce.

To us a rocket propelled semi auto grenade launcher would be an area effect weapon, as using it against a single human would be pointless.

But to space marines it's basically the AK-47 of the astartes, considering the things they regularly fight.
08-24-14 02:23 AM
Vaz Being able to be used as such does not a weapon make.

A knife is not a ranged weapon. Sure, it can be thrown. I must have thrown my bayonet thousands of times at a board and got it to stick point first in the throat of a mansized target shape in a board in my room. Doesn't make it a ranged weapon, though.

The Deuce is not a precision weapon by intent, design or use. The bolter, meanwhile, is something that is intended to kill even on a miss - similar to the 50. cal - it is fired at a RoF fast enough, with a wide enough AoE in a cone of effect to wound and suppress enemy light infantry and vehicles that are not coated in sheet metal.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
08-23-14 10:00 PM
Reaper45 Just going to point out the fact that the idea of precision weapon is misleading.

The Browning M2 was used as an antimaterial rifle on occasions, and I'm fairly certain it's probably the poster boy of non precision.
08-23-14 09:49 AM
Vaz There are some modified, and so many different patterns it's a possibility that slightly smaller versions exist - it's impossible to say otherwise. Sororitas use power armour, which has reinforcing fibre bundles etc that aids in the use of the Boltgun.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
08-23-14 07:57 AM
Stormxlr I would imagine that boltguns also come in different size? Can't see human sized SoB using Astartes sized boltguns. Same for Bolt Pistols and Storm Bolters?
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome