Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - Reply to Topic
40k Rules Discussion Post any Warhammer 40k rules queries and discussions here.

Thread: Quick question weapon skills Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-30-14 07:52 PM
Nordicus Huh, I hadn't noticed that at all. Good eye!
05-30-14 06:22 PM
neferhet good catch. i wonder if that is intended or just error...i'll take that as intended. seems good to me.
05-30-14 05:36 PM
DeathKlokk Huh, good catch. That's pretty big for Tau.
05-30-14 04:51 PM
JAMOB I noticed that too - I think the point is that there aren't really WS1 models, so it makes sense that an untrainted combatant (think guard conscript) would have trouble against a veteran warrior (think space marine).
05-30-14 11:31 AM
Zeebye
Quick question weapon skills

Noticed a difference in the weaponskill 2 vs 4 section. It says now WS2 vs WS4 hits on 5+ as opposed to the other doubled values of 4+. (WS1 vs WS2, WS3 vs WS6 etc all hits on 4+) Is this an error or are they just trying to piss the riptide off?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome