Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - Reply to Topic
40k Fluff Discuss GW background material here. All those bits in the Codex that aren't stat blocks or special rules. Post your custom character/chapter/army background in our Homebrew Fluff subforum!

Thread: Macharius- Greatest military mind in imperial history Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-09-13 07:12 AM
Kreuger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperorguard500 View Post
the dark age of technology led into the age of strife which is where the whole anti-technology bias of the imperium came in

the great crusade came after that
You're making a fallacious argument here, substituting correlation with causation.

Just because the dark age of technology came right before the age of strife didn't mean they are connected.

What the people of the 41st millennium refer to as "the dark age of technology" was a period of time before the gestation of Slaanesh where human scientific learning flourished and grew strong. Unfortunately, some folks misused their technology for awful destructive purposes, but that doesn't void that vast value of the learning during the quote-unquote dark age. In point of fluff-fact the dark age was an age of scientific enlightenment. The STC systems were devised during the dark age of technology.

The age of strife meanwhile wad a period parallel to the gestation of Slaanesh, where in space travel wad impossible and humanity lost contact with its far flung members and without the support and learning often devolved into more barbaric societies.

Please be clear, the dark age of technology did NOT cause the age of strife.
12-09-13 06:49 AM
gothik from what i read they cloned him now theres an honour...maybe seeing as one ended up in the Penal Legions Last Chancers, not just that, great military mind he might have been but i would also say spoilt and prone to tantrums, when his men did not follow him into the Halo regions he drank himself into a stupor and moaned about no brave men/women...still they made him a saint and renamed his homeworld after him...can't be bad
12-09-13 06:17 AM
Reaper45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperorguard500 View Post
the dark age of technology led into the age of strife which is where the whole anti-technology bias of the imperium came in

the great crusade came after that
The age of strife was civil war, there was nothing about technology becoming a bad thing it literally was what most people consider the dark ages to be.

When the emperor was interred to the golden throne is when things went down hill.
12-09-13 05:38 AM
Emperorguard500 the dark age of technology led into the age of strife which is where the whole anti-technology bias of the imperium came in

the great crusade came after that
12-07-13 06:53 AM
Stormxlr @Emperorguard500 nope it was the empirial truth and emperor himself propagated science,reason and disproved of religion. You could say science was controlled due to fragile state the imperium was in, but in no way was it looked down upon. All the tech we have right now was engineered/rediscovered during the 30-31st millennia. Also even right now in 40th millennia technology is still advancing at a barely crawling speed but still advancing. New STC are discovered and already discovered ones are getting accepted.
12-07-13 06:09 AM
Emperorguard500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geist View Post
The world's didn't reject imperial rule, his generals did. From what I understand (reading the wiki), as soon as Macharius died, his 7 generals all seceded from the Imperium and divvied up Macharius' conquest. Not really much a world can do when the army that conquered you secedes from their own empire.

Hell, even the Space Marine chapters that took part in that crusade went crazy and started fighting each other, which seems like too much of a coincidence for it to have happened without an outside source(maybe chaos? They were fighting Chaos Marines at one point in the crusade)



Again, it was a different imperium. First, the Space Marine Legions, which were pretty much in charge of all conquest, "knew no fear", so of course they would have followed their leaders into the abyss. Second, the philosophies and beliefs of the average imperial man are vastly different between the great crusade and the 41st millennium. During the great crusade, the Imperial Truth was widespread and humanity trusted in science and reason, there was no reason to believe that the Halo Stars would be any more difficult to conquer than the rest of the galaxy. 41st millennium though means that the average imperial citizen is ignorant and superstitious and is absolutely terrified of "Going beyond the Emperor's light".

Honestly though, the fluff for the Macharian Heresy is a little dumb, and it's obviously just an attempt to shoehorn one last Alexander comparison (where his empire falls apart after his death), despite how unlikely it sounds that 6 of the most trusted commanders in the most successful crusade since the Great Crusade just happen to decide that the Imperium can suck it and split off to do their own thing( not to mention all the troops who are raised from birth to worship the Emperor and Imperium.
i thought the great crusade came after the age of technology and age of strife, so during the great crusade technology progression was looked down upon
12-07-13 05:05 AM
Geist
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEQinc View Post
Surely it is the duty of a conqueror to hold the worlds he takes? Otherwise he's just a raider with pretensions of greatness. It isn't solely the province of others to make the world loyal, how the conqueror goes about taking the world has an overwhelming impact on how the world feels about becoming Imperial. It determines how open they are to the work of the missionaries. The worlds taken by the Primarchs for the most part were willing to listen to the iterators, because of the strategies used to take those worlds. The worlds Macharius took uniformly rejected Imperial rule, clearly that reflects badly on how he took them.
The world's didn't reject imperial rule, his generals did. From what I understand (reading the wiki), as soon as Macharius died, his 7 generals all seceded from the Imperium and divvied up Macharius' conquest. Not really much a world can do when the army that conquered you secedes from their own empire.

Hell, even the Space Marine chapters that took part in that crusade went crazy and started fighting each other, which seems like too much of a coincidence for it to have happened without an outside source(maybe chaos? They were fighting Chaos Marines at one point in the crusade)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormxlr View Post
Yet the Imperium endured even during the Horus Heresy but those worlds Macharius conquered fell to dissaray right after his death. This shows much about his ways, sure he grinded them down and won the land, but not the people even his own man were too tired to follow him. However i am sure during the great crusade the imperial man would have followed their leader's even into that abyss.
Again, it was a different imperium. First, the Space Marine Legions, which were pretty much in charge of all conquest, "knew no fear", so of course they would have followed their leaders into the abyss. Second, the philosophies and beliefs of the average imperial man are vastly different between the great crusade and the 41st millennium. During the great crusade, the Imperial Truth was widespread and humanity trusted in science and reason, there was no reason to believe that the Halo Stars would be any more difficult to conquer than the rest of the galaxy. 41st millennium though means that the average imperial citizen is ignorant and superstitious and is absolutely terrified of "Going beyond the Emperor's light".

Honestly though, the fluff for the Macharian Heresy is a little dumb, and it's obviously just an attempt to shoehorn one last Alexander comparison (where his empire falls apart after his death), despite how unlikely it sounds that 6 of the most trusted commanders in the most successful crusade since the Great Crusade just happen to decide that the Imperium can suck it and split off to do their own thing( not to mention all the troops who are raised from birth to worship the Emperor and Imperium.
12-07-13 04:47 AM
Stormxlr I wouldn't even say based, it is literally translated into 40k.
12-07-13 04:44 AM
Jacobite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ddraig Cymry View Post
Basically, Alexander the Great in space.
There is no basically about it. Macharius is Alexander the Great in space. His entire story and post death story is hamstrung by this. Just like with Alexander worlds/lands captured feel into disarray not because he didn't conquer them properly but because the leaders left behind were too busy fighting amongst themselves. Two SM chapters came to blows during the aftermath for goodness sake, the issue isn't Macharius's ability to lead or conquer it's that it's based on (or let me rephrase "carbon copied from") Alexander and their stories mirror.
12-07-13 03:44 AM
Stormxlr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geist View Post


That wasn't his job. His job was to conquer, it was the "missionaries and Inquisitorial teams that followed those conquests that were supposed to do the job of turning those planets into loyal parts of the imperium.

Same for the Primarchs, they conquered, but for the most part it was the Imperial Army and the Orators who's job it was to maintain those conquests.
Yet the Imperium endured even during the Horus Heresy but those worlds Macharius conquered fell to dissaray right after his death. This shows much about his ways, sure he grinded them down and won the land, but not the people even his own man were too tired to follow him. However i am sure during the great crusade the imperial man would have followed their leader's even into that abyss.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome