Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - Reply to Topic
General 40k This is the place to talk about everything related to Warhammer 40k.

Thread: 2016 40k Wish List Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-14-16 06:45 PM
Rush Darling 1. New Tyranid codex. I still enjoy playing my bugs, but some of the units feel unnecessarily, if still hilariously, weak. Hell, I'd settle for just an update on Shadow in the Warp.

2. Another shout out for more regular FAQs. The lack of communication can feel downright rude sometimes, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. On the plus side, it's where GDubs let's itself down that the community really shines for me, and whilst my local gaming group doesn't use tournament FAQs religiously, between those and forums like these we can nearly always find a reasonable, unbiased interpretation of any ambiguous rules.

3. SM Jump pack command squads? I'm reaching for the stars here, as RG have been very well looked after by both gdubs and FW lately, but a man can dream.
01-14-16 05:50 PM
BloodangelBlake110 I'd like to see an update to the BA dex as well.

Lemartes sucks as a special unit and I think that making him able to move to the Lords category with an update in his rules that reflects this as a major improvement. The problem I have is that he's such an awesome looking character with such an awful set of rules that makes using him a real damper...
01-12-16 08:51 PM
MidnightSun
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntaw View Post
Huh?
It's categorically, scientifically proven that the evil incompetent bastards at GW writing terrible rules and making the Codexes horribly imbalanced (for example, the army you play is total shit but your opponent's army, that's fucking broken man) is responsible for over 90% of losses in 40k.

It's not just people being bad at the game, no sir.
01-12-16 07:23 PM
ntaw
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidnightSun View Post
Nah, over 90% of all losses in 40k are caused by your opponent's WAAC bullshit powergaming beating your shitty behind the curve bottom tier Codex that GW hates.
Huh?
01-12-16 06:58 PM
SonofVulkan My wish list for 40k would be:-

1. A new Chaos Space Marine codex with specific legion rules.
2. A new Buggy/Wartrack plastic kit for Orks. (Maybe if this new Specialist Games thing gets going they will release a new box set of Gorkamorka full of them.)
3. For me to paint up a whole army without getting side-tracked, selling stuff on e-bay, starting again and repeating in some sort of mad never-ending hobby loop.
01-12-16 06:16 PM
MidnightSun
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntaw View Post
You know, despite them being a 'bottom of the pile' army book when it comes to tournament/overly competitive play I get a lot of flak over my Blood Angel army (and it's not like I play all Drop Pods or Forgeworld nuttiness either). The only things that have straight up dunced me are Pod'd grav Centurions and Forgeworld stuff I'd never faced before (Fire Raptors, Dread Claws, etc.).
Nah, over 90% of all losses in 40k are caused by your opponent's WAAC bullshit powergaming beating your shitty behind the curve bottom tier Codex that GW hates.
01-12-16 06:02 PM
ntaw
Quote:
Originally Posted by conscriptboris View Post
3 - Blood Angels to Stop Sucking.
You know, despite them being a 'bottom of the pile' army book when it comes to tournament/overly competitive play, I get a lot of flak over my Blood Angel army (and it's not like I play all Drop Pods or Forgeworld nuttiness either). The only things that have straight up dunced me are Pod'd grav Centurions and Forgeworld stuff I'd never faced before (Fire Raptors, Dread Claws, etc.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by MidnightSun View Post
I wish for regularly updated FAQs or releases that bring all the armies to a more consistent power level.
Holy crap I am so with you on this. Consistent FAQs would be SO NICE.
01-12-16 04:55 PM
Asamodai 1) The fruition of the Deathwatch rumours.

That's it honestly. Anything else I can think of is AoS.
01-12-16 02:53 PM
Moriouce 1) See to it that every unit that is in a codex also have a plastic/resin kit.
2) Ork Warboss multi-part-kit, all options. Make it two kits, one Mega-armour/basic with 'eavy armour option.
3) More race specifik scenary.
01-12-16 01:56 PM
Nordicus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mossy Toes View Post
All I really want is a solid CSM book, honestly...
Agreed.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome