ASF and High Elves: Opinions - Page 2 - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
General Warhammer This is the place to talk about everything related to Warhammer Fantasy.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 07:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Amra_the_lion's Avatar
Amra_the_lion's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thorton CO
Posts: 730
Reputation: 1
Default

I dont have a problem with HE having ASF. Its not gamebreaking just because you dont like the strategy to deal with it (you dont have to spam the guns to break down T3 heavy armored elves...). The swordmasters are footsloggers, so avoid them, or shoot them. Skaven are due for a new book soon, I'd expect a tasty powercurve boost.

When I have swordmasters to deal with with my empire, I will
A. shoot them to whittle them down
B. NOT charge in my detachments (just lets more masters get attacks in) unless the swordmasters only have 2 or 3 ranks left.
Dont add meat to his blender.

"And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air;
And there came a great voice
Out the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying: It is done."
Amra_the_lion is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 08:36 AM
Member
 
Vaul's Avatar
Vaul's Flag is: New Zealand
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 82
Reputation: 1
Default

you charged a unit of 20 swordmasters with ANY units? That was just plain foolishness... if your opponent is foolish enough to take a list with that kind of unit, you don't just hand your ass to him on a plate. Shoot it, don't charge it.

Vaul is offline  
post #13 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 09:08 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
NagashKhemmler's Avatar
NagashKhemmler's Flag is: Australia
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 630
Reputation: 1
Default

I find it kind of imbalanced that a unit made up of relatively cheap models is able to rape almost everything in the entire warhammer world that's of the same size and not a character. In fact I doubt there is ANYTHING else that would've survived that triple charge scenario without running away, their massively overpowered nature is due to ASF. If they keep it with their great weapons, they need a points increase at the very least. Units like them basically invalidate cavalry.

As for skaven I can't see what is really going to improve them against high elves, white lions, swordsmasters, asf for an awesome combo. The skaven army will end up relying upon destructive magic and ranged weaponry and avoiding combat at all costs, especially against elves.

Flanking and intelligent maneuvering is now a thing of the past if your opponant plays high elves.

My knew strategy will become hit table with bat, it solves all :D.

Elves aren't exactly slow either, swordsmasters can kind of cover the table relatively quickly with a movement of 5 and you can't always avoid them, comments like that make me wonder if some people even play warhammer of just 40k.

And FYI I won my games against the pointy ears so the L2P comments really, really aren't necessary.

It was the fact that I had to resort to crappy tactics to win which I hated.

Edited: As above, individual points costs aren't allowed - squeek

Last edited by squeek; 05-05-09 at 11:13 AM.
NagashKhemmler is offline  
 
post #14 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 09:18 AM
Member
 
Vaul's Avatar
Vaul's Flag is: New Zealand
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 82
Reputation: 1
Default

I'm going to follow my last post up with an analysis of why you lost, and an explanation of a way you could win in the same situation if you planned better. It can be done without resorting to shooting. Read on, you might learn something.

In warhammer, combats have two dynamics - actual damage inflicted, and static combat res. By simultaneously giving three sides of his large unit of swordmasters things to strike at, you were actually generating combat res for him. Your big static res from the multi-charge was totally overwhelmed by the damage he caused, and you should have known that before charging him. Here's how it works:

Unit in the side = +1 for flank
Unit in the other side = +0 because you have the other flank already
Unit in the rear = +2 for rear
Overall = Breaking his ranks (-3)

But he gets far more than the net +6 in pure kills because you've allowed 11 of his models to fight... and they are models with better weapon skill, strength and attacks than yours. I can't over-emphasize how much of a mistake it was to charge him like this, so yes it is in fact a bad tactic.

Here's how you could have done it.

You charge in the flank ONLY with a unit of 20 clanrats. Your clan rats have 2-3 assassins in it. The assassins leap out, striking before the swordsmasters as they also have ASF, but you beat him on initiative. Charging in the flank negates his ranks, gives you +1, but you only engage 4 of his models as opposed to the 5 that you would engage if you charged his rear. Even two naked assassins are likely to get 2 kills, leaving him with only 2 models to attack back. Say he gets three wounds, you have your ranks, outnumber, and a +1 for flanking. You win the round. To be even more certain of victory, tool up your assassins, and give the clanrats a warbanner or something similar.

20x swordsmasters + Full command = 330 points

20x Clanrats + Full command + War banner + 2x Assassins = 360

Fairly close in points! But since you break his unit, you've now got a chance to attack the rest of his army with your stuff. If it were me, I would take just the one assassin, kill half his guys with shooting, then charge the flank where he would have 2 on the side, and kill them with a tooled up assassin.

Edited: Please do not post individual points costs of items like the war banner - squeek


Last edited by squeek; 05-05-09 at 11:18 AM.
Vaul is offline  
post #15 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 09:19 AM
WFB Moderator
 
Tim/Steve's Avatar
Tim/Steve's Flag is: United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 8,248
Reputation: 13
Default

Hmm... never played HE but I'm really struggling for tactics. Ogre shooting is just rubbish. I know people will tell me that leadbelchers are great (and potentially they are) except that I've so far rolled more then 50% misfires with them.
I know more people will say that with almost all my units able to do impact hits I may in fgact be the ideal army to kill HE... but they're wrong. Any clever/experienced HE player will move to within 6" and deny me the bull charge

-other then that most of my army is T4 5+ or 6+ save... I'll take loads of wounds off SM and cant really stop it. Gnoblars might be my only hope (oh god its worse then i thought)

Tim/Steve is offline  
post #16 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 09:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Reputation: 1
Default

Personally i donīt like the asf army wide rule either but i can deal with it on the table top. Since i play dark elves so i can spam S3 shooting to kill them and i never charge them with anything not even charaters and monsters.


i donīt play skaven but i would probaly use a couple of ratling guns to kill the unit. I know they are unreliable but the few times i have played skaven i had great succes with them.
Arcanum is offline  
post #17 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 11:39 AM
Must keep painting....
 
squeek's Avatar
squeek's Flag is: United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,977
Reputation: 1
Default

Just a general note to all posters. Please do not post individual points costs of items, models or upgrades. It is against forum rules - squeek

Personally I don't regard armywide ASF as broken, it just requires a different approach to play against in my opinion. As Captain Galus points out, there are plenty of units where the auto extra points for ASF are virtually impossible to win back in standard games. In effect ASF as an armywide rule is actually not as competitive as allowing it as a bought option for Specials, if this were the case then your SMoH, PG and DP would all still have ASF for the same cost. The difference being that the parts of the army where ASF is useless wouldn't buy it, so there would be more points for extra SMoH, etc. So please don't ask GW for that option if you think armywide ASF is too powerful.

I would also regard a unit of 20 SMoH as a massive points sink and quite uncompetitive. Most HE players take SMoH in units that consist of 1 or 2 ranks, they are far too expensive to have as SCR troops and are laughably easy to kill with ranged or magic attacks. Your normal unit of SMoH would be maybe 7 in a single rank, devastating and cheap!

A unit of 20 SMoH is the classic eggs in one basket Deathstar, instead of multi-charging you and using something cheaper for SCR, or fast to negate your SCR, the HE player is relying on an expensive choice to provide its own SCR which would normally be regarded as a bad decision. ASF does mean they can just advance that block of 20 SMoH at you and ignore things like charging and flanking, so in this case it does make this player lazy. So take advantage of that.

As Vaul says, don't put more models in combat than you need to, if you do you are just cancelling out your opponents mistake at taking redundant troops. The way SMoH win combat is by each model in combat being highly likely to take out a T3 opponent, so as you pointed out you wont get much chance to strike back. So build a unit to take the SMoH. Use assassins, use the banner of the swarm (or the war banner) to boost your SCR, think about taking a few items specifically for the SMoH deathstar like a brass orb or the warp scroll.

You may also need to decide that the massive block of SMoH your opponent takes is just as bad as you taking lots of shooting to deal with it in this case, so it is fine for you to riddle it full of holes. Yes SMoH can move quick enough, but if you march block them they are just infantry so aren't going to go anywhere that fast, if you can keep a lid on their movement they might only get 1 or 2 combats in the entire game, as long as you don't feed him units you should be ok to weather that storm and they will not make their points back.

I don't wish to tell you how to suck eggs, but in this case the tactics you described above are flawed. Your opponents tactics in taking a huge block of SMoH are also flawed, so use it against them. SMoH are great in combat, pretty useless out of it, so only attack them with one unit at a time in CC and make the most of the other phases.
squeek is offline  
post #18 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-05-09, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
Ascendant Valor's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Joliet, Illinois, USA
Posts: 320
Reputation: 1
Default

Squeek, Vaul, and Captain Gallus (and others, of course!) have this dead on.

Sword Masters are the penultimate Close Combat unit. They love to be enveloped by weak troops (Low Toughness, Low Armor, Low Wounds). This allows them to have fantastic odds of generating lots of Active Combat Resolution. As you've seen, they can certainly overpower Static Combat Resolution in the right circumstances.

As Vaul said, all you did was feed "meat to the grinder." As Vaul and Squeek disclosed, your best bet would be to just tie them up with a cheap unit to the front, or sick some assassins and their cohorts on the Sword Masters to the flank (made worthwhile from the extra combat resolution).

Your overall goal is to deny them the opportunity to optimize their potential. The High Elf players want their Sword Masters stuck in combat with a boat-load of junk units. Magic them, Shoot them, or tie them up to deny them this. There's also plenty more ways to confront the issue at hand, and as a Skaven player I'd imagine you could have plenty up your sleeve to surprise most stalwart Elf players!

White Lions are just as tough to bring down. They're Stubborn with the same save in CC, and hit like a ton of bricks. They specialize in fighting High Armor or Toughness troops. Deny them that ability, and you're golden. Oh, and Static Combat Resolution (they'll get +1 or +2 for ranks, +1 for banner, probably won't outnumber or anything of the like, and can deal out six attacks to the front maximum). Unleash the Hordes!

Phoenix Guard are the hardest to kill of all. Their Ward Save and Heavy Armor tends to keep them around for a long time. They cannot generate offensive damage, though. Their Halberds just aren't enough to tackle Hordes. You'll have to beat these guys with Static Combat Resolution here. Just don't get outnumbered.

I know you said you beat the High Elves before. What did you do to win? Since you won, why do you see it necessary to complain about the Sword Masters? Sure, they're nasty, but you overcame the rest of the army after all was said and done. We can all agree that they were a points sink in your specific situation, so did that have something to do with it, NagashKhemmler? Or did the rest of your tactics allow you to smash the Asur? Fill us in; we need some context so we can help you out better!

I hope this and everyone else's comments help, NagashKhemmler. Happy Hunting!

"In the eyes of the Elves of Ulthuan there exists no fear, only grim determination.

Until one has witnessed them in combat, one cannot comprehend the power that they possess."
Ascendant Valor is offline  
post #19 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-06-09, 01:11 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
NagashKhemmler's Avatar
NagashKhemmler's Flag is: Australia
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 630
Reputation: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaul View Post
I'm going to follow my last post up with an analysis of why you lost, and an explanation of a way you could win in the same situation if you planned better. It can be done without resorting to shooting. Read on, you might learn something.

In warhammer, combats have two dynamics - actual damage inflicted, and static combat res. By simultaneously giving three sides of his large unit of swordmasters things to strike at, you were actually generating combat res for him. Your big static res from the multi-charge was totally overwhelmed by the damage he caused, and you should have known that before charging him. Here's how it works:

Unit in the side = +1 for flank
Unit in the other side = +0 because you have the other flank already
Unit in the rear = +2 for rear
Overall = Breaking his ranks (-3)

But he gets far more than the net +6 in pure kills because you've allowed 11 of his models to fight... and they are models with better weapon skill, strength and attacks than yours. I can't over-emphasize how much of a mistake it was to charge him like this, so yes it is in fact a bad tactic.

Here's how you could have done it.

You charge in the flank ONLY with a unit of 20 clanrats. Your clan rats have 2-3 assassins in it. The assassins leap out, striking before the swordsmasters as they also have ASF, but you beat him on initiative. Charging in the flank negates his ranks, gives you +1, but you only engage 4 of his models as opposed to the 5 that you would engage if you charged his rear. Even two naked assassins are likely to get 2 kills, leaving him with only 2 models to attack back. Say he gets three wounds, you have your ranks, outnumber, and a +1 for flanking. You win the round. To be even more certain of victory, tool up your assassins, and give the clanrats a warbanner or something similar.

20x swordsmasters + Full command = 330 points

20x Clanrats + Full command + War banner + 2x Assassins = 360

Fairly close in points! But since you break his unit, you've now got a chance to attack the rest of his army with your stuff. If it were me, I would take just the one assassin, kill half his guys with shooting, then charge the flank where he would have 2 on the side, and kill them with a tooled up assassin.

Edited: Please do not post individual points costs of items like the war banner - squeek
You forget that assassins are a hero choice and in beating a single special choice of his, you have now used two hero choices? Come on that isn't even feasible and will leave you blown to pieces in the magic phase.

Well the point of my post wasn't as much about balance, as I initially said, although that was part of it.

My main point of contention was that it removed a large part of the tactics of warhammer. The HE players I see now move in what would be a suicidal manner for any army. I feel that the tactical aspects of the game are lessened by ASF.

I did what everyone said one should do against swordsmasters/white lions etc. I shot them to pieces with magic/ranged weapons which was all I could do really. After all my biggest point of contention is that the ASF rule completely invalidates certain units in certain armies more than anything has before, for example with my Tomb Kings the 'heavy' cavalry is useless, for a model which will be smashed, its biggest advantage neutralised (getting the charge first). I think this is a big issue and whilst I agree High Elves needed a buff from how they were before, this wasn't the right direction to take, giving a rare ability army wide? As a result of how many HE players there are in my local club, I've not basically maxed out ranged units with my two armies, taken almost no melee units or cavalry and to me, this is disapointing but it's all I can do to be competitive with their current rules.

Edited: Don't post individual points costs - squeek

Last edited by squeek; 05-06-09 at 11:00 AM.
NagashKhemmler is offline  
post #20 of 64 (permalink) Old 05-06-09, 05:03 AM
Senior Member
Ascendant Valor's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Joliet, Illinois, USA
Posts: 320
Reputation: 1
Default

I respect your point, NagashKhemmler. With some MathHammering, I can see why you're upset with the ability. But the fact is, army-wide ASF is there. We can create High Elf armies that drop the ASF as much as we want but the official publication states that High Elves have it.

So, at this point we can see that it's not an issue of wishing they didn't have it. Moreover, it's an issue of how to deal with it. Do you agree? Maybe we're still missing something?

"In the eyes of the Elves of Ulthuan there exists no fear, only grim determination.

Until one has witnessed them in combat, one cannot comprehend the power that they possess."
Ascendant Valor is offline  
Closed Thread

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > Warhammer Fantasy Battles & Age of Sigmar > General Warhammer

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome