why is 40k more popular than fantasy? - Page 2 - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
General Warhammer This is the place to talk about everything related to Warhammer Fantasy.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 32 (permalink) Old 05-29-13, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
Vaz's Avatar
Vaz's Flag is: United Kingdom
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 12,830
Reputation: 79

Because Fantasy's shit. As a long time Fantasy player, I've come to the realisation after they churned out Warriors of Chaos, Daemons of Chaos and High Elves in a short space of time that really didn't know what the fuck they're doing.

It was balanced, and Vampires was the best book that GW have ever produced, IMHO, including 40K, but not FW or WHForge. Then they came out with retarded stuff. Utterly.

Fantasy has become a toy range; in a way, 40K is as well, but the difference is, they're mostly useable. Look at Fantasy's biggest releases, and they're simply turning into modelling projects. They're now too big, too daft, and have utterly retarded rules that 6th edition managed to perfect away from 5th edition stupidity.

The game is now so random that the actual units you use do not matter. While I realise it is a fun game, and meant to be so, it can be broken easier by some armies ability to remove the randomness and force dice rolls, while others cannot have that same effectiveness, and just crumble when their one shtick fails.

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Originally Posted by Bindi Baji View Post
It's not a black and white question really, there are different shades of anal probing,
a rectum spectrum, if you will
Vaz is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 32 (permalink) Old 05-29-13, 04:21 PM
Senior Member
iamtheeviltwin's Avatar
iamtheeviltwin's Flag is: USA
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Beyond the Pale
Posts: 992
Reputation: 32

My LGS is almost 100% 40k in the store (although the manager says there is a healthy fantasy community that plays at people's homes).

As for my personal reason for prefering 40k over fantasy. I like the heroic style sci-fi setting of 40k with guns, vehicles, etc. There are other similar games and in general I prefer them.

Why I avoid fantasy has to do with my original miniature playing was Ral-Partha and other historical miniature games. If I want to move large blocks of models, I fall back on Historicals...I would rather run large blocks of French heavy knights or Hoplite infantry than Grail Knights or Skaven.

Servants of the Laughing God (Harlequin Themed Eldar Army)
First Eastern Mirage Corps (C:SM)
I am the Evil Project Log (All my work since restarting the hobby)
The Crusade of Morr (WFB Empire Battle Reports)
Dem Bones (Dice Rolling Program)
iamtheeviltwin is offline  
post #13 of 32 (permalink) Old 06-01-13, 10:04 PM
Senior Member
Azezel's Avatar
Azezel's Flag is: United Kingdom
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 1,137
Reputation: 3

Higher model count and player base are both factors. Probably the largest factors other than GW's balls-out focus on Space Marines.

There is another, though.

People always say that Fantasy is the more tactical game. The more cranial, and challenging game.

When I was first expanding into Fantasy I thought that was plain elitism and swore I'd never say it.

It's actually true though. Of the two, Fantasy is far more the thinkin' man's game.

Not everyone wants their leisure time to involve more thinking than necessary. When I played 40k I often found that whole turns had elapsed without my being able to remember them. I'd been playing (and winning) on auto-pilot.

One simply cannot do that in Fantasy, to play successfully, even to lose well, one needs to keep one's brain engaged with the game. Some people like that, others prefer a game that lets the brain idle for a few hours.

It's like asking why the telly is more popular than reading.

I's still peg GW's marketing policy as the number one reason, though.

It's impossible to overstate the degree to which GW pushes 40k and Marines in particular.

If Little Timmy (and/or his mum) walks into a Games Workshop without knowing anything about the games they sell, well, 90% of the time he'll walk out with a box of smurfs in his hot little hand. The one and only time I've been in a GW shop the assistant spoke to me for almost a minute about my Sisters of Battle before trying to flog me a Stormraven. I bet if I'd been a Fantasy man back then, he'd still have tried.

Actually - it'll be even worse than that now... Little Timmy, knowing nothing about the hobby will be offered an intro game, of 40k - using the Dark Vengeance models. Marines Vs Marines.

"See, Timmy, these guys are super cool Space Marines with motorbikes with guns on them! And these guys are super cool Space Marines with spikes and battle axes! Which do you want to collect?"

If he's lucky, he'll see some red boxes on a shelf somewhere, and might even hear that LotR exists, in some nebulous fashion.

Looking for a friendly wargaming club on the Isle of Wight? Drop me a line.

Sisters of Battle - The Order of Glory Undimmed - 2'500 Points | High Elves - House Cyredeth - 2'500 Points | Bretonnians - The Muster of Sir Jules Estelle - 3'000 Points
Azezel is offline  
post #14 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-05-13, 06:53 AM
Senior Member
chromedog's Avatar
chromedog's Flag is: Australia
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Newcastle, OZ
Posts: 2,410

Fantasy is more popular around where I live.
It's certainly more popular at my clubs.

40k was more popular up until 6th ed hit, when many of the players decided to return to playing fantasy. We have multiple 60+ player events a year locally for WHFB.
Can't even get 30 for a single 40k event.

Hey! Where'd ... Everybody ... go?
chromedog is offline  
post #15 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-05-13, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
daxxglax's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 384
Reputation: 7

As seems to be the case with many of you, in my area Fantasy tends to attract older, veteran gamers; It seems to require more strategy than 40k. The fact that the kits are more expensive and you need more models for an army are definite barriers, which is why I've never been able to bring myself to start a Fantasy army.

That aside, I think the Fantasy background tends to appeal more to older gamers while the 40k fluff is more accessible for everyone. I enjoy the 40k background on a much deeper level than I did when I first started playing, but it still remains the reason I get into my chosen armies. The 40k armies can seem less archetypical than the Fantasy ones (even though they've got plenty of expies, i.e. "Elves in Space:, "Tomb Kings in Space.")
daxxglax is offline  
post #16 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-08-13, 11:22 AM
MidnightSun's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Sheoth
Posts: 6,741
Reputation: 83

See, I disagree with the sentiment that it's more tactical. Fantasy, in the few games I've played but the many I've seen, boils down to bring a big fuckoff block of infantry and as many Level 4 Wizards as you can, then follow a set of fairly inflexible tactics (seriously, I've never seen High Elves do anything except sit on Throne of Vines and buff the shit out of either Swordmasters or Phoenix Guard. Never. I got bored playing Ogres because it's a. cast buffs, b. charge. That's the whole game plan). 40k has it's own imbalances (shooting > combat, for example), but unlike Fantasy you can build an army with minimal shooting, or minimal combat, or whatever. In Fantasy, you take a magic-heavy army, because it's the only competitive option.


Creator of Utilitarian Ultramarines Memes - join the XIII on Facebook (no XVII allowed).
MidnightSun is offline  
post #17 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-08-13, 05:28 PM
Senior Member
KahRyez's Avatar
KahRyez's Flag is: USA
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 140
Reputation: 3

40k is more popular around where I live most of the reasons stated. I personally haven't gotten a fantasy army because building a skaven army is expensive >.>

-There is nothing that can not be beat with a proper application of gauss fire-
Bloody Harvest of Destroyer Lord Badrum W- D- L-

-Vengeance for the betrayed!-
Dark Talons CSM Warband(Dex:CS) W- D- L-

You can round up a million maggots to try to defeat me... but you'll still all just be maggots!
- Luca Blight
KahRyez is offline  
post #18 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-21-13, 09:55 PM
Senior Member
Machiavellismx's Avatar
Machiavellismx's Flag is: United Kingdom
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 158
Reputation: 1

I think it's something else. My area like most is 40K, but there's a strong fantasy contingent. That being said, I used to think along the lines of 40K is more for kids/young adults, and fantasy is for adults. I'm an example - started out with Fantasy, liked the look of 40K, switched to 40k, before stopping the hobby (moving to uni, money reasons etc).

Now nearly 6/7 years later I'm 23 and loving fantasy again and find the tactical approach, the vastly different armies and army rosters of each race far more interesting and diverse. Say what you want about the games, but 40K certainly has the certain-lists-smash-tournament kind of armies - remember the space marine drop pods lists?! - but fantasy has a much, much larger amount of competitive lists. Yes, you need mages to be competitive, but that's like saying you need troops to be competitive. Of course you do, it's a given. But it's not the be-all-end-all. If you spend all your points on mages, they're going to die. Badly. They need support troops. Fantasy is the game of a perfect army roster balance. Core, heavy hitters, troublemakers, mages, artillery, monsters, monster hunters, the list goes on.

So why is 40K more popular? I think the two reasons stated are pretty accurate; easier learning curve, less models per army equals less cost. But for me, the main overall reason is what I'd call the 'instant action'. Things die in 40K, and they die quickly.

Think about it - Fantasy is the game of tactics. Movement, the right charge, flanking, breaking, running down. It comes down to a very big game of rock paper scissors. Everything in the game has a counter, a weakness, and the meat of it is to exploit your opponents weaknesses without allowing your own to be hit. Your army is made up of rock-paper-scissors units, and its about matching them with the right targets, and throw in some luck.

40K on the other hand, whilst I'm not for a second disputing the tactics and some variance in lists, I'm a fan of both games after all, is more forgiving. You learn quicker, because there's less to use, and certain weapons can kill most things. You can make bad decisions and lose but make similar bad decisions in fantasy and more often than not you'll be massacred.

And as I said, things die much quicker. On turn one in 40K, you're not so concerned with moving your troops the perfect charge distances, you're not so bothered with allowing your flanks exposed, you're not trying to move a battle line. Your guys go forward, or they hold steady for the most part. But they shoot, they shoot a lot, and something often dies. It's quicker action, less foreplay. Guys run forward with guns and tanks and blow stuff up. Therefore it appeals the action gamer, and the kids who want to see something happen straight away.

But for those who like the foreplay of fantasy the real (and for me larger) reward is watching your epic plan of battle go perfect. And it's damn hilarious when it doesn't and your mage blows up, your hellcannon eats its crew and your chaos warriors flee from skaven. That's the luck of the game, you try to minimise the luck, but it's what makes it unpredictable and fun. It's about risk versus reward and tactics versus luck. For me, it's a fine and dandy balance. It's a poor metaphor, but if Fantasy is Chess, then 40K is closer to checkers.

Though I've noticed far more kids (by kids I mean below the age of say, 21) playing Fantasy at my local GW and clubs. It's a cool sight. I think most fantasy players fall into two categories: you have the guys who like the tactical aspects and greater depth of play, and you have the guys who like the fantasy setting over the sci-fi.

(Though I'm going to be awkward and say I think the 40K universe is far more badass. I love the fluff more, but fantasy has its own and great stories.)

My sons, the galaxy is burning.
We all bear witness to a final truth - our way is not the way of the Imperium
Machiavellismx is offline  
post #19 of 32 (permalink) Old 08-06-13, 08:52 PM
Junior Member
SkorpioXVII's Flag is: England
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Inside your base, killing your dudes
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1

As a younger gamer (15), in a younger gamer dominated area, 40k wins due to all the aforementioned reasons. By far the largest factor is start up costs and the time constraints of setting up.
I love the strategy and coordination Fantasy brings, but it cannot really beat the action, ease and all round experience 40k brings. The greater fluff freedom, customisation and army themes really appeals to most

Twitter = @SkorpioXVII

SkorpioXVII is offline  
post #20 of 32 (permalink) Old 08-06-13, 09:38 PM
Stella Cadente's Avatar
Stella Cadente's Flag is: Zaire
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: blahblahblahblah
Posts: 6,663
Reputation: 10

Fantasy?...what's that?...ohhhh you mean the boxes that hold the shelves up in stores?

Stella Cadente is offline  

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > Warhammer Fantasy Battles & Age of Sigmar > General Warhammer

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome