Interesting blog that raises some relevant points about 40k. - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
General 40k This is the place to talk about everything related to Warhammer 40k.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 01:13 AM Thread Starter
Dazed and confused.
 
Khorne's Fist's Avatar
Khorne's Fist's Flag is: Ireland
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 8,496
Reputation: 105
Default Interesting blog that raises some relevant points about 40k.

Do you agree with his final assertion that GW has ruined 40k? I know I've only played 3 games of 6th Ed, but that has more to do with everyone around me giving it up within weeks of 6th coming out.

The War Altar: What happened, GW?
Khorne's Fist is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 01:40 AM
Senior Member
 
ntaw's Avatar
ntaw's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 6,323
Reputation: 99
Default

Fliers cost too much? eBay. I really don't know why people hate 6th so hard, and if you do then play 5th, or whatever edition you like, within your gaming group. Organize tournaments using whatever rules or variations on the rules that you like.

Quote:
Are there any other reasons why someone would choose to suffer under the yoke that is 6th edition 40k? Other than raw fanboism, no.
Big ol' sack of meh.

Unfortunately Canada got rid of the penny and now my two cents rounds down to zero, so...take it for what you will.

40k Army Projects

Industrial Table WIP
ntaw is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 02:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,685
Reputation: 10
Default

The only thing I think is that GW is trying to entice more 12 year olds to start in 40K rather than give the adult players what they need.
Reaper45 is offline  
 
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 03:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Jolnir's Avatar
Jolnir's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 272
Reputation: 3
Default

Just sounds like another angry 40k guy, and there are lots of those. There are other wargames out there, but I chose this one because of the sheer mass of its fan base, the sweet models/army choices, and the grim dark fluff. It isn't super balanced, but that can be changed. Don't like 6th? As said before, go back to an edition as early as you want.
Jolnir is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 05:01 AM
Token Trans Mod
 
Zion's Avatar
Zion's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the internet.
Posts: 6,385
Reputation: 103
Default

I don't agree that 40k is "ruined". Has some sticking points, sure, but hardly ruined.
Zion is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 05:12 AM
Spored to be Wild
 
morfangdakka's Avatar
morfangdakka's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,376
Reputation: 30
Default

I don't think it is ruined as it states. I haven't played many games in 6th but that has more to do with work schedule and lack of people to play against. It has some problem areas but every edition does so that is nothing new. It really does sound like an angry player more than anything. I also am not a big fan of flyers but they add a new dimension to the game.


Red Orc
"Ahh, isn't Morfang sweet, like a great big 350-pound (that's 25 stone, UK users!) ball of cuddly death...?"


God, gives children to people so that death won't seem so disappointing.
morfangdakka is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 01:53 PM
So be it.
 
JAMOB's Avatar
JAMOB's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,900
Reputation: 15
Default

Yeah lots of things really bite about 6th, but it's still a damned fun game, and if people don't try to make their lists overpowered than it is still strategically fascinating. I agree that it doesn't work for major tournaments, but it's good for standard play.

Quote:
If you go down to the woods today, be wary
JAMOB is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 02:56 PM
Closet Dictator
 
Old Man78's Avatar
Old Man78's Flag is: Ireland
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sector 7 G
Posts: 3,403
Reputation: 34
Default

I think the guy has some valid points, particularly what he said about actual "wargaming" with the advent of flyers and lords of war, there is an element of the tactical side of the game kind of made redundant with the abundance of large pie/flame plate death and rapid fire oblivion. I do not think the game has been ruined but I do think G.W has been getting lazy because of the success of 40k and needs to be careful not to collapse under the weight of its own glory, transient 12 year olds will not keep a gaming community going. And has been said before on Heresy, 40k turning into apocalyse lite, were you need a truck to transport your army actually makes it harder to get out and game

Old Man78 is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
 
AAAAAAAAARRRGGHH's Avatar
AAAAAAAAARRRGGHH's Flag is: Denmark
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denmark, the capital of Ikea
Posts: 1,359
Reputation: 8
Default

Poor article is poor. And very biased. For some reason he takes "the fact" that 6th is a crappy edition for granted, instead of pointing out what makes it so and to whom.

I, for instance, is having good fun with 6th edition, even though there are many parts of it's rules I despise. This is not because, as the articles author would have you believe, I can't face reality (which apparently is that 40k is no fun), but because I love the game, or at least it's essentials, and because my gaming group have found a way to make it fun in spite of the game's flaws.

All that article really says is: "I like competitive wargames, and because 40k does not lend itself well to that it sucks, and therefore you people are all fooling yourselves if you think you like it and you should all play something else."

The only interesting thing about that article is how it states it isn't being polemic on purpose, in spite of the author's single-minded view of 40k and it's players. It's almost like he doesn't understand the meaning of the words he writes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezlad View Post
So you're a wanker?
Who cares? Anyone that says they don't wank is a lying twat. Wank hard, wank often.

Last edited by AAAAAAAAARRRGGHH; 04-13-14 at 03:21 PM.
AAAAAAAAARRRGGHH is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-11-14, 03:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Straken's_Fist's Avatar
Straken's_Fist's Flag is: South Georgia
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,094
Reputation: 18
Default

These discussions and debates always cover the same arguments and counter-arguments:

1. The rules suck and it's unbalanced vs. Homebrew your own rules

2. But I shouldn't have to homebrew as I am paying good money for the game vs. Well GW make it clear they aren't interested in balance by not supporting tournaments and pointing out the 6th edition rulebook is a guide and 'forging a narrative' is the most important thing...They are not interested in balance and are not promoting and marketing the game as such. So why expect that?

3. It's expensive vs. Look at the other gaming systems out there, they are priced exactly the same and some are even more expensive (look at Infinity and Malifaux box sets). Also, if you really cannot afford it (like me) then buy from ebay or the 1/3 off websites. Learn how to paint strip etc. Makes it pretty affordable.

4. But you need so many more models for 40k than other systems vs. Well yeah, 40k has always been like this so what did you expect? I'd argue that the amount of choice you have now in 40k for lists and factions is the highest bar none. The FOC is nuts now with the amount of detachments/supplements you can take, yet people complain about it.

5. But you can still have a balanced game even for fun games - This is about the only point I haven't seen a decent counter-argument against. But again, GW are clearly encouraging you to homebrew when you read through the rulebook. They are not spoon feeding people rigid rules that must be adhered to at all times, and point out you should be making your own missions and the FAQ's are not even set in stone they are "just our interpretation within our meta." (I seem to remember an email response from GW clearly stating something this)...
Yet a vocal minority of people still play it as if their rules are set in stone and refuse to come up with their own missions (at least try the Crusade of Fire missions), and wonder why they are so frustrated with the game...
Straken's_Fist is offline  
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > Warhammer 40K > General 40k

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome