Most interesting/best written legion portrayed in the horus heresy serires - Page 2 - Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums
Black Library Fiction Here is where you can discuss your favourite Black Library publications and graphic novels. If it's published by Black Library it goes here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-22-14, 03:56 PM
Dazed and confused.
 
Khorne's Fist's Avatar
Khorne's Fist's Flag is: Ireland
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 8,495
Reputation: 105
Default

I look at it slightly differently, in that the best portrayals for me are the ones that change the view I already had of them. That means the UMs, SWs and TS for me.

The Smurfs and Guilliman were given character they never really had before, the SWs were turned from jolly drunken space vikings into grim, vicious warriors willing to do whatever it takes to complete any mission given to them, and up to A Thousand Sons all we'd ever seen of the TS was the automatons that were the Rubricae.

Honourable mention goes to the Word Bearers. It was nice to see how they fell out of a misplaced sense of duty rather than just because they were pissed off bad guys.
Khorne's Fist is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-22-14, 04:03 PM
Senior Member
bobss's Flag is: England
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 2,628
Reputation: 8
Default

Definitely the Salamanders.

Can't beat reading about hammers and lava and anvils and flames and hammers and burning and anvils every paragraph.
bobss is offline  
post #13 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-22-14, 04:45 PM
Member
 
Znoz's Avatar
Znoz's Flag is: Latvia
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Latvia
Posts: 50
Reputation: 1
Default

For me it's Word Bearers and Iron Warriors.
(First Heretic, Aurelian, Angel Exterminatus)




What? Boo is outraged! See his fury! It's small, so look close. Trust me, it's there.
Znoz is offline  
 
post #14 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-24-14, 02:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 180
Reputation: 2
Default

The Emperors Children have been done very very well in my opinion. Love them or hate them, and I have kinda done both, they have by far the most depth and character to them.

I think people have been basing their judgements on the books legions have appeared in rather than how the legions have been written.

The EC's and the Ultramarines have received the most coverage I think and it's not surprising that the smurfs are close to the top of everyones list, however, I don't feel there has been the same depth of character development as there has been with guys like Lucius, Fabius, Eidelon and others and, because of their 'pursuits' they've also been the legion that has gone through the greatest amount of change from the starting trilogy, through Fulgrim and into Angel Exterminatus where I think they were portrayed superbly as a twisted, perverted legion, the only traitor legion to, imo, really have embraced chaos. I like the fact there has been this huge outrageous progression to an absurd over the top legion, it fits perfectly with manner of their corruption. I really don't like them, but there is a perverse desire to see what characters like Fabius get up to. Have had my fill of Fulgrim though.

The main problem with the Ultramarines is that there is a lot of them and they've not been able to concentrate of particular characters too much, especially when so many have been killed. However, as a legion I think we have been given a very good indication of legion behaviour and mindset. The whole theoretical and practical must surely now be the most established phrase for any legion.

I think the World Eaters were really well done as well, though that was more a really good portrayal of a primark, the best portrayal imo, as Angron wasn't turned against the emperor, he was never for the emperor. I am biased on this because it just so happens that Angrons opinion on the Emperor and the Empire is pretty much exactly my opinion on it and has been since before the heresy books existed.

White Scars - Meh. Don't think they've been done well or poorly. Just very average.

Dark Angels - no real identity with the real big legion issues not being addressed at all and just silly little sub plots that seem unnecessary in telling the story of the heresy - so far.

Iron Warriors - can't remember anything about them, but I do think they did Perturabo well. I do recall them not taking to the Emporers Children which I was pleased about, I didn't want everyone just to full in line and except everything that was going on.

The Thousand sons had I feel two very different portrayals. Their main portrayal was good and gave some depth to the legion, their other portrayal I think was weak, shallow and predictable.

I've not liked the development of the space wolves. They are just too heavily portrayed like Vikings and it just smacks of a lack of imagination to me. Plus there has been too little character development. I actually cant think of any space wolf characters beyond Russ.

Iron Hands. Hmmm. Mixed bag here. Individually they have been portrayed well and I've enjoyed seeing them as the odd survivor here and there joining up with other survivors, however, I do not like this machine over flesh stuff. Interestingly I dislike them just as much as I dislike the emperors children, both because of the path their pursuits of perfection have taken them.

Lunar Wolves were done well. I liked the character development in the trilogy and I am really pleased that Lokien is now a grey knight. However, the Sons of Horus are whiny snivelling turds and that portrayal has wrecked the legion. I really don't want to hear any more about them if they are constantly going to burst in to tears every time horus gets close to danger.

Word Bearers. Individual characters have been done very well though I don't like the portrayal of Lorgar who can topple titans with a fart in the wind and shatters planets when taking a dump. Just stupidly ott. The legion though I think has suffered at the expense of character development. They gone through significant change as well but I couldn't tell you what they are all about beyond thinking their all mini-me's of Erabus.

Salamanders have been giving a good grounding in how they do things, but I also find them boring.

The worst portrayal by far has been the Blood Angels - oh god that was horrible. If I had to use one word to describe the blood angels it would be, camp. Just no no no no no no a thousand times no.

Special mention must go to the Perpetuals. Ole Person has been fantastic. John has been pretty damn decent as well and there is so many places this could all go. I like how they keep popping up to influence events, helps add new twists. However, I was disappointed at the perpetual in Vengeful Spirit (sorry, didn't want to list books but had to be mentioned).
Stephen74 is offline  
post #15 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-24-14, 04:01 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 22
Reputation: 2
Default

For me it'd have to be either the Thousand Sons, for their role in "A Thousand Sons" or Word Bearers for "The First Heretic".

The Thousand Sons come off as very distinct and different from the other legions due to their psyker powers. The way that they are shunned by their brothers and eventually shackled by the Emperor himself is really fascinating.

Some of this is also present in the case of the Word Bearers.
I think their portrayal in "The First Heretic" does an excellent job of showing the critical flaw that the legion was created with. To me it felt like a tragic but inevitable fall that was impossible to avoid due to the very nature of zealous spiritual thirst of the legion that is embodied by Lorgar himself.

Check out my Warhammer 40k Book reviews at: Warhammer 40k Book Reviews Youtube Channel
40kBookReviews is offline  
post #16 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-24-14, 09:20 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Garviel loken.'s Avatar
Garviel loken.'s Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 279
Reputation: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen74 View Post
The Emperors Children have been done very very well in my opinion. Love them or hate them, and I have kinda done both, they have by far the most depth and character to them.

I think people have been basing their judgements on the books legions have appeared in rather than how the legions have been written.

The EC's and the Ultramarines have received the most coverage I think and it's not surprising that the smurfs are close to the top of everyones list, however, I don't feel there has been the same depth of character development as there has been with guys like Lucius, Fabius, Eidelon and others and, because of their 'pursuits' they've also been the legion that has gone through the greatest amount of change from the starting trilogy, through Fulgrim and into Angel Exterminatus where I think they were portrayed superbly as a twisted, perverted legion, the only traitor legion to, imo, really have embraced chaos. I like the fact there has been this huge outrageous progression to an absurd over the top legion, it fits perfectly with manner of their corruption. I really don't like them, but there is a perverse desire to see what characters like Fabius get up to. Have had my fill of Fulgrim though.

The main problem with the Ultramarines is that there is a lot of them and they've not been able to concentrate of particular characters too much, especially when so many have been killed. However, as a legion I think we have been given a very good indication of legion behaviour and mindset. The whole theoretical and practical must surely now be the most established phrase for any legion.

I think the World Eaters were really well done as well, though that was more a really good portrayal of a primark, the best portrayal imo, as Angron wasn't turned against the emperor, he was never for the emperor. I am biased on this because it just so happens that Angrons opinion on the Emperor and the Empire is pretty much exactly my opinion on it and has been since before the heresy books existed.

White Scars - Meh. Don't think they've been done well or poorly. Just very average.

Dark Angels - no real identity with the real big legion issues not being addressed at all and just silly little sub plots that seem unnecessary in telling the story of the heresy - so far.

Iron Warriors - can't remember anything about them, but I do think they did Perturabo well. I do recall them not taking to the Emporers Children which I was pleased about, I didn't want everyone just to full in line and except everything that was going on.

The Thousand sons had I feel two very different portrayals. Their main portrayal was good and gave some depth to the legion, their other portrayal I think was weak, shallow and predictable.

I've not liked the development of the space wolves. They are just too heavily portrayed like Vikings and it just smacks of a lack of imagination to me. Plus there has been too little character development. I actually cant think of any space wolf characters beyond Russ.

Iron Hands. Hmmm. Mixed bag here. Individually they have been portrayed well and I've enjoyed seeing them as the odd survivor here and there joining up with other survivors, however, I do not like this machine over flesh stuff. Interestingly I dislike them just as much as I dislike the emperors children, both because of the path their pursuits of perfection have taken them.

Lunar Wolves were done well. I liked the character development in the trilogy and I am really pleased that Lokien is now a grey knight. However, the Sons of Horus are whiny snivelling turds and that portrayal has wrecked the legion. I really don't want to hear any more about them if they are constantly going to burst in to tears every time horus gets close to danger.

Word Bearers. Individual characters have been done very well though I don't like the portrayal of Lorgar who can topple titans with a fart in the wind and shatters planets when taking a dump. Just stupidly ott. The legion though I think has suffered at the expense of character development. They gone through significant change as well but I couldn't tell you what they are all about beyond thinking their all mini-me's of Erabus.

Salamanders have been giving a good grounding in how they do things, but I also find them boring.

The worst portrayal by far has been the Blood Angels - oh god that was horrible. If I had to use one word to describe the blood angels it would be, camp. Just no no no no no no a thousand times no.

Special mention must go to the Perpetuals. Ole Person has been fantastic. John has been pretty damn decent as well and there is so many places this could all go. I like how they keep popping up to influence events, helps add new twists. However, I was disappointed at the perpetual in Vengeful Spirit (sorry, didn't want to list books but had to be mentioned).
Oll Perrson has qucikly became my third favourite character in 30/40k lore. I am so happy the brought him back, and i am really liking how he is a perpetual. Him sacraficing his imortality for mankind will be epic. I also agree that Alivia, the perpetual in Vengeful Spirit was very bad.
Garviel loken. is offline  
post #17 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-25-14, 04:06 AM
Senior Member
 
MontytheMighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,764
Reputation: 9
Default

Hands down the White Scars

Chris Wraight literally had to build the legion from almost scratch. He did so admirably without resorting to Mongol stereotypes (in fact his Scars are distinct from both European stereotypes of Mongols and historical Mongols). The result is a unique, interesting legion with its own distinct flavour
MontytheMighty is offline  
post #18 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-25-14, 04:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,685
Reputation: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malus Darkblade View Post
Everyone keeps raving about Betrayer but I didn't really see the World Eaters develop. They were hampered on day 1 because of the whole butchers nails in terms of character development and Argal Tal was the star of the show I feel.

And similarly with Scars, I don't get the sense that they got the revamp the Wolves and Bearers got.
So in the entire reading of the book you never once felt bad for Angron or any of the world eaters?

Throughout the book there's subtle hints of what Angron could have been had the emperor never left him to his fate. If the emperor did the intelligent thing and ordered the world eaters to go down to Nuceria, and support their gene sire and his gladiator army in fighting their oppressors, could have very well lead to him becoming a primarch with a loyalty on the level of Russ Or even higher.

He himself could have fought alongside Angron and earned his respect. Angron for all his flaws cared about honor their fighting pits were an example of that.

Without the nails he could have been an extremely compassionate person who might have been level with vulkan in terms of not causing excess casualties.

Then there's the world eaters themselves, remember that one captain who didn't do his job and protect the ship? The one who the human captain shot in the face? The other world eaters sided with her and basically ensured that it would never happen again.

That's allot more depth than just being a mindless berserker whose only goal is killing anything that's not a world eater.
Reaper45 is offline  
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums > Fiction, Art and Roleplay Game Discussion > Black Library Fiction

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome