Wargaming Forum and Wargamer Forums - View Single Post - Why bother with the new 40k Deathwatch?
View Single Post
post #33 of (permalink) Old 03-05-16, 12:29 AM
Tyriks
Senior Member
 
Tyriks's Avatar
Tyriks's Flag is: USA
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 326
Reputation: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jin View Post
y? u r not human?

y play a game that makes u sad?

Look, brainchild, this has everything to do with the current discussion.
There is only one crowd.
You choose to see things otherwise, as is typical, but this bigotry is post hoc.

"Why bother" is a question that arises in a certain context.
Note how the recent comments have advised that the player collect for a more powerful force as written in the rules.
And yet, one commenter has suggested rather that he wants to collect a less powerful perhaps allied detachment per the rules because this is fun, like the Last Chancers with some role-play built in.
So, from this perspective, collecting Deathwatch is very worthwhile.
From a "competitive" card-game point of view, it is senseless, because everyone knows that collections are justified when they result in hyper-powered raw stacked decks.
Well, sometimes, especially maybe after 30,000 years of war, people are not able to stack their decks anymore. The universe is not full of super-killy raw idiocy. Rather, one must use what one has, e.g. Last Chancer style.

In my opinion, this box is one of the coolest things I have seen from GW in a very long time,
including the 30k box.
But, of course, I am discouraged from buying it because I don't want to show up for a game with some card player who is looking for practice with his deathstar and have the poor bean counter be disappointed to play against a list that 'no one wants to play against'.
If you want to boast about your reading comprehension, might want to make sure you can actually understand what is being said. You obviously failed to comprehend my post.
Tyriks is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome